Lewis v. Lane
Citation | 832 F.2d 1446 |
Decision Date | 09 December 1987 |
Docket Number | Nos. 87-1103,87-1171,s. 87-1103 |
Parties | Cornelius LEWIS, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Michael LANE and James Thieret, Illinois Department of Corrections, Respondents-Appellants. Cornelius LEWIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michael LANE, Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections, and James Thieret, Warden of Menard Correctional Center, Respondents-Appellees. |
Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit) |
J. Steven Beckett, Reno O'Byrne & Kepley, Champaign, Ill., for petitioner-appellee.
Jack Donatelli, Asst. Atty. Gen., Chicago, Ill., for respondents-appellants.
Before CUMMINGS, CUDAHY, and COFFEY, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner, Cornelius Lewis, his sister, Bernice Lewis, and Willie Sangster were indicted in Macon County, Illinois, on February 21, 1979, and charged with the offenses of murder, armed robbery, and aggravated kidnapping in connection with the robbery of the Citizens National Bank in Decatur, Illinois, on December 14, 1978, during which a bank security guard was shot and killed. Sangster's case was continued and petitioner and his sister Bernice were tried together. A jury found both guilty of all three charges. Petitioner was subsequently sentenced to death for murder. Bernice was sentenced to concurrent prison terms of forty years for murder, thirty years for armed robbery, and thirty years for aggravated kidnapping.
The Illinois Supreme Court on direct appeal affirmed petitioner's conviction and death sentence. People v. Lewis, 88 Ill.2d 129, 58 Ill.Dec. 895, 430 N.E.2d 1346 (1981). The Supreme Court of the United States subsequently denied certiorari. Lewis v. Illinois, 456 U.S. 1011, 102 S.Ct. 2307, 73 L.Ed.2d 1308. Petitioner then sought post-conviction relief in the Illinois courts. See Ill.Rev.Stat. ch. 38, p 122-1 et seq. An Illinois circuit court denied post-conviction relief, and the Illinois Supreme Court again on direct appeal affirmed the lower court's order. People v. Lewis, 105 Ill.2d 226, 85 Ill.Dec. 302, 473 N.E.2d 901 (1984). Certiorari was again denied. Lewis v. Illinois, 474 U.S. 865, 106 S.Ct. 184, 88 L.Ed.2d 153.
On November 13, 1985, the Illinois Supreme Court granted petitioner a stay of execution pending his filing a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The stay was subsequently extended to cover the outcome of the federal habeas corpus proceedings which were commenced pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 on March 31, 1986. The habeas petition challenged both the conviction and the death sentence. Petitioner claimed that his conviction had been obtained in violation of his right under the Sixth Amendment to effective assistance of counsel. He further claimed that his Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel had also been denied during the sentencing phase of his case. Finally, he claimed that the Illinois Death Penalty Act, Ill.Rev.Stat. ch. 38, p 9-1, was unconstitutional under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.
The district court held that petitioner had failed to demonstrate ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674, during the guilt phase of his trial. See United States ex rel. Lewis v. Lane, 656 F.Supp. 181 (C.D.Ill.1987). However, the court held that he had been denied his Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel during the sentencing phase of his prosecution and accordingly issued a writ of habeas corpus vacating the death sentence and ordering resentencing. In light of its holding with regard to petitioner's sentencing, it did not reach the constitutionality of the Illinois Death Penalty Act. Respondent appeals the court's grant of the writ of habeas corpus ordering resentencing. Petitioner cross-appeals the district court's denial of relief as to his conviction. We affirm.
28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254(d) provides that the factual findings of a state court are presumed to be correct in a federal habeas corpus proceeding. See Sumner v. Mata, 449 U.S. 539, 101 S.Ct. 764, 66 L.Ed.2d 722. Like the district court, we adopt the Illinois Supreme Court's following statement of facts in People v. Lewis, 88 Ill.2d 129, 136-41, 58 Ill.Dec. 895, 898-90, 430 N.E.2d 1346, 1349-51 (1981):
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Jones v. Page
...of sufficient prejudice ... that course should be followed." Strickland, 466 U.S. at 697, 104 S.Ct. at 2069; see also Lewis v. Lane, 832 F.2d 1446, 1459 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 829, 109 S.Ct. 83, 102 L.Ed.2d 59 (1988) ("reaching the prejudice issue first will often obviate th......
-
Valeriano v. Bronson
...of counsel's performance, if it is easier to dispose of the claim on the ground of insufficient prejudice"); see also Lewis v. Lane, 832 F.2d 1446, 1460 (7th Cir.1987). We conclude that it is appropriate to decide this case by asking first whether the failure to raise the "year and a day" i......
-
Lowery v. Anderson
...balance between defense and prosecution that the trial was rendered unfair and the verdict rendered suspect." Lewis v. Lane, 832 F.2d 1446, 1452 (7th Cir.1987), quoting Kimmelman, 477 U.S. at 374, 106 S.Ct. 2574. Lowery's second trial was not distorted in this fashion based on the represent......
-
Hill v. Mitchell
...disorder and the corresponding possibility that he was "in the throes of a manic episode during the offense"), and Lewis v. Lane, 832 F.2d 1446, 1457 (7th Cir.1987) (finding prejudice where counsel stipulated at mitigation hearing to the existence of two prior felony convictions that did no......
-
The chronic failure to discipline prosecutors for misconduct: proposals for reform.
...v. Coachmen Indus., 938 F.2d 650, 655, 659 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Swanson, 943 F.2d 1070, 1076 (9th Cir. 1991); Lewis v. Lane, 832 F.2d 1446, 1459, 1465 (7th Cir. 1987); Lowenschuss v. Bluhdom, 613 F.2d 18, 21 (2d Cir. 1980); Asphalt Eng'rs, Inc. v. Galusha, 770 P.2d 1180, 1184 (......
-
Ten of the Easiest Ethics Violations for Honest Lawyers
...(Md. 1991). 15. 861 P.2d 717 (Colo. 1993). 16. 638 P.2d 8 (Colo. 1981). 17. 817 P.2d 969 (Colo. 1991). 18. 861 P.2d 704 (Colo. 1993). 19. 832 F.2d 1446 (7th Cir. 20. 606 P.2d 45 (Colo. 1979). 21. 807 F.Supp. 653 (D.Colo. 1992). 22. People v. Goens, 803 P.2d 480 (Colo. 1990). 23. People v. H......