TriMed, Inc. v. Stryker Corp. P 2010/6/9 10-1153.pdf ASBCA Parker v. Secretary of the Air Force N 2010/6/9 09-3201.pdf MSPB Reyes v. Office of Personnel Management N 2010/6/9 10-1120.pdf ASBCA WEDJ/Three C's v. Secretary of Defense N 2010/6/9 09-5116.pdf DCT California Human Development Corp. v. United States N 2010/6/7 09-7093.pdf CAVC Roberson v. Shinseki P 2010/6/7 09-7129.pdf CAVC Nielson v. Shinseki P 2010/6/7 09-5078.pdf CFC Strategic Housing v. United States P 2010/6/4 08-1334.pdf DCT Silicon Graphics, Inc. v. ATI Technologies, Inc. P 2010/6/3 08-1511o2.pdf DCT Therasense Inc. v. Becton; TIVO v. Echoctar. [en banc scheduling order] N 2010/6/3 09-1553.pdf DCT Purdue Pharma Products L.P. v. Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., (2010)

Extract

---

TriMed, Inc. v. Stryker Corp. P 2010/6/9 10-1153.pdf ASBCA Parker v. Secretary of the Air Force N 2010/6/9 09-3201.pdf MSPB Reyes v. Office of Personnel Management N 2010/6/9 10-1120.pdf ASBCA WEDJ/Three C's v. Secretary of Defense N 2010/6/9 09-5116.pdf DCT California Human Development Corp. v. United States N 2010/6/7 09-7093.pdf CAVC Roberson v. Shinseki P 2010/6/7 09-7129.pdf CAVC Nielson v. Shinseki P 2010/6/7 09-5078.pdf CFC Strategic Housing v. United States P 2010/6/4 08-1334.pdf DCT Silicon Graphics, Inc. v. ATI Technologies, Inc. P 2010/6/3 08-1511o2.pdf DCT Therasense Inc. v. Becton; TIVO v. Echoctar. [en banc scheduling order] N 2010/6/3 09-1553.pdf DCT Purdue Pharma Products L.P. v. Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., (2010)

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

TRIMED, INCORPORATED,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

STRYKER CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

2009-1423

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in case no. 06-CV-1918, Judge Manuel L. Real.

Decided: June 9, 2010

LEE F. GROSSMAN, Niro, Scavone, Haller & Niro, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were MARK M. GROSSMAN, Grossman Law

Offices, of Chicago, Illinois; and SEAN M. KNEAFSEY,

Kneafsey, Tostado & Associates LLP, of Los Angeles, California.

GREGORY J. VOGLER, McAndrews, Held & Malloy,

Ltd., of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were ROBERT A. SURRETTE and

STEPHANIE F. SAMZ.

TRIMED v. STRYKER 2

Before LOURIE, LINN, and MOORE, Circuit Judges.

LINN, Circuit Judge.

This patent infringement action returns to us for a second time after having been previously appealed and remanded on claim construction and infringement questions in TriMed, Inc. v. Stryker Corp., 514 F.3d 1256 (Fed. Cir. 2008) ("TriMed I"). In the present appeal, TriMed, Incorporated ("TriMed") challenges a decision of the United States District Court for the Central District of California granting summary judgment of invalidity of the asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 5,931,839 ("the '839 patent") in favor of Stryker Corporation ("Stryker"). Because the district court improperly resolved genuine issues of material fact in...

See the full content of this document

---