SKF USA Inc. v. United States erratum 12/06/99, (1999)

Extract

---

SKF USA Inc. v. United States erratum 12/06/99, (1999)

PAGE: 1

:

SKF USA INC. and SKF GmbH; FAG : KUGELFISCHER GEORG SCHAFER AG : and FAG BEARINGS CORPORATION, :

:

Plaintiffs and Defendant- : Intervenors, :

: Consol. Court No. v. : 97-01-00054-S :

UNITED STATES, : :

Defendant, : :

and : :

THE TORRINGTON COMPANY, : :

Defendant-Intervenor and : Plaintiff, :

:

and :

: NTN BEARING CORPORATION OF AMERICA and : NTN KUGELLAGERFABRIK (DEUTSCHLAND) : GmbH; SNR ROULEMENTS, :

:

Defendant-Intervenors. : ________________________________________:

Plaintiffs and defendant-intervenors, SKF USA Inc. and SKF GmbH (collectively "SKF") and FAG Kugelfischer Georg Schafer AG and FAG Bearings Corporation (collectively "FAG"), move pursuant to Rule 56.2 of the Rules of this Court for judgment on the agency record challenging the Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration's ("Commerce") final determination, entitled Antifriction Bearings (Other Than Tapered Roller Bearings) and Parts Thereof From France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Singapore, Sweden, and the United Kingdom; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews and Partial Termination of Administrative Reviews ("Final Results"), 61 Fed. Reg. 66,472 (Dec. 17, 1996), as amended, Antifriction Bearings (Other Than Tapered Roller Bearings) and Parts Thereof From Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United

PAGE: 2

Kingdom: Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews, 62 Fed. Reg. 3,003 (Jan. 21, 1997). Defendant-intervenor and plaintiff, The Torrington Company ("Torrington") also moves pursuant to Rule 56.2 of the Rules of this Court for judgment on the agency record challenging Commerce's Final Results.

SKF claims that Commerce erred in: (1) disregarding SKF's negative home market billing adjustment number two values in calculating foreign market value ("FMV"); and (2) including SKF's zero-value United States transactions in its margin calculations.

FAG claims that Commerce erred in: (1) disregarding transactions that had not failed its profit comparison test when calculating constructed value ("CV") for cylindrical roller bearings; (2) including general and administrative ("G&A") expenses unrelated to FAG's further manufacturing activities in its calculation of increased value for further manufacturing; and (3) including losses related to the sale of FAG's Korean joint venture facility in its calculation of FAG's G&A ratio.

Torrington claims that Commerce erred in: (1) accepting FAG's reported research an...

See the full content of this document

---