Viraj Forgings Ltd. v. United States, (2002)
United States Court of International Trade
Linked as:United States Court of International Trade
Linked as:Extract
Viraj Forgings Ltd. v. United States, (2002)
PAGE: 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x: VIRAJ FORGINGS LTD. and M/S DISHAKA U.S.A., INC., :Plaintiffs, : v. : ConsolidatedCourt No. 99-03-00123: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, :Defendant. : - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - xOpinion [Plaintiffs' motion for judgment on the agency record granted, in part.]Decided: May 6, 2002Miller & Chevalier, Chartered (Peter Koenig) for the plaintiffs.Robert D. McCallum, Jr., Assistant Attorney General; David M. Cohen, Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice (Lucius B. Lau); and Office of Chief Counsel for Import Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce (Cindy G. Buys and Edna Boyle-Lewicki), of counsel, for the defendant.AQUILINO, Judge: By order of the court upon the consent of the parties, this action consolidates a complaint in the name of Viraj Forgings Ltd., a producer of merchandise allegedly within the ambit of the Amended Final Determination and Antidumping Duty Order; Certain Forged Stainless Steel Flanges from India, 59 Fed.Reg. 5,994 (Feb. 9, 1994), of the International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce ("ITA"), with a subsequent summons andPAGE: 2complaint in the names of the same Indian pro...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
Neilson v Lagow 53 U.S 98 12 How 98 1851 | in re raymond clay and scott clay, d/b/a the emporium, petitioners., 35 f.3d 190 (5th cir. 1994) | 24 CFR 35.1335 Standard treatments. | Locklear v. Remington, (3rd Cir. 2003) | decisión de juzgado septimo superior del trabajo de caracas de february 15 2012 | Sentencia nº 5603 de Consiglio di Stato November 11 2009 | Sentencia nº 5516 de Consiglio di Stato, November 04, 2009 | sentencia nº 168 de consiglio di stato, may 25, 2010