Extract
Viscofan, S.A., Petitioner V. U.S. International Trade Commission, Union Carbide Corp., And Teepak, Inc., Respondents, 787 F.2d 544 (1986)
Appeal No. 85-2282
787 F.2d 544(Decided March 18, 1986)Thomas V. Heyman, Dewey, Ballantine, Bushby, Palmer & Wood, of New York, New York, argued for appellant. With him on the brief were Saul P. Morgenstern and Claire Ann Koegler. Steven H. Bazerman and Julius Rabinowitz, Kuhn, Muller & Bazerman, of New York, New York, of counsel.Judith M. Czako, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, of Washington, D.C., argued for appellee International Trade Commission. With her on the brief were Lyn M. Schlitt, General Counsel and Michael P. Mabile, Assistant General Counsel.H. Blair White, P.C., Sidley & Austin, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for appellee Union Carbide. With him on the brief were David T. Pritikin, Rex E. Lee, Richard E. Young, Sidley & Austin, of Washington, D.C., C. Frederick Leydig, Homer J. Schneider, Charles S. Oslakovic, Mark E. Phelps, Leydig, Voit & Mayer, Ltd., of Chicago, Illinois and Thomas I. O'Brien, Clyde V. Erwin, Union Carbide Corp., Danbury, Connecticut.Appealed from: U.S. International Trade Commission.Before FRIEDMAN, Circuit Judge, NICHOLS, Senior Circuit Judge, and BISSELL, Circuit Judge.FRIEDMAN, Circuit Judge.This petition to review challenges (1) aspects of a remedial order the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) entered in a proceeding under section 337 of the Tariff...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
