Knight v. Craig Administrator
Decision Date | 01 February 1810 |
Citation | 3 L.Ed. 193,6 Cranch 183,10 U.S. 183 |
Parties | M'KNIGHT v. CRAIG'S ADMINISTRATOR |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
To continue reading
Request your trial10 cases
-
Union Nat. Bank of Wichita, Kan. v. Lamb
... ... 95; Michigan Trust Co. v ... Ferry, 228 U.S. 346, 57 L.Ed. 867; Lessee of Walden ... v. Craig's Heirs, 14 Pet. 147, 10 L.Ed. 393; ... United States v. Ritchie, 17 How. 525, 15 L.Ed. 236; ... ...
-
Newman v. Graddick
... ... Barnett v. Rodgers, 410 F.2d 995 (D.C.1969); see Fed.R.Civ.P. 25(d)(1); McKnight v. Craig Adm'r, 10 U.S. (6 Cranch) 183, 187, 3 L.Ed. 193 (1810); Ranson v. Brennan, 437 F.2d 513, 516 (5th ... ...
-
Corbin v. Blankenburg
... ... , a plan beneficiary, a plan fiduciary, or (for suits against the Secretary) a plan administrator) specifically named in 29 U.S.C. Sec. 1132. And if the action had been brought by a person not ... As the Fifth Circuit said in Ransom, citing Chief Justice Marshall's opinion in M'Knight v. Craig's, Adm'r, 10 U.S. (6 Cranch) 183, 187, 3 L.Ed. 193 (1810), "[a] substituted party steps ... ...
-
Plimpton v. Mattakeunk Cabin Colony
... ... "Death of parties; substitution of executor or administrator. When either of the parties, whether plaintiff or petitioner or defendant, in any suit in any court ... In 1810, Chief Justice Marshall said in McKnight v. Craig's Administrator, 6 Cranch, 183, at page 187, 3 L. Ed. 193: ... "* * * The ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results