RAILWAY COMPANY V. BUCHTEL

Decision Date01 January 1879
Citation101 U. S. 638
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED

STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Syllabus

In a suit against B. upon his contract guaranteeing the payment of the purchase money of certain land, A. recovered judgment for the first installment. In a subsequent suit for the remaining ones, B. set up the same defense as in the first suit, that the contract was induced by the fraudulent representations of A. as to the quantity of timber on the land, and he moreover alleged that they amounted to a warranty, upon the breach of which he was entitled to recoup the damages sustained. Held that the judgment, having been rendered upon the finding of a referee that such representations were not made, is conclusive, as to the facts found, in all subsequent controversies between the parties on the contract.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

MR. JUSTICE FIELD delivered the opinion of the Court.

In the preceding case between these parties, we affirmed the judgment of the court below recovered for the first installment of money due upon the contract of purchase of certain timber lands in Michigan, the payment of which had been guaranteed by the defendant below, the Lumber Company. The present action was for the remaining installments of the purchase money.

To the first action the defendant set up that it was induced to make the contract of guaranty by certain false and fraudulent representations of the plaintiff as to the quantity of merchantable timber on the land. To the present action it sets up the same defense, and also that the representation made as to the quantity of timber, to induce the execution of the contract, amounted to a warranty, upon breach of which it was entitled to recoup the damages sustained. To meet these defenses, the plaintiff produced the judgment in the former case, and the question presented for determination is whether that judgment was conclusive.

As to the first defense, there can be no doubt that such must be the effect of the judgment. The case was between the same parties for the first installment on the contract guaranteed, and

Page 101 U. S. 639

a recovery was there resisted upon precisely the same ground here urged.

The extent and effect of a former recovery between the same parties upon the same question raised in a new action have been so often considered and determined by this Court that it would be a waste of time to go over the argument and repeat our views on the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
47 cases
  • Village of Heyburn v. Security Savings & Trust Co.
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • July 9, 1935
    ... ... SECURITY SAVINGS & TRUST COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant No. 6161 Supreme Court of Idaho July 9, 1935 ... Co., 227 U.S. 434, 33 S.Ct. 274, 57 L.Ed. 586; [55 Idaho ... 757] Mason Lumber Co. v. Buchtel, 101 U.S. 638, 25 ... L.Ed. 1073; Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v ... Kirven, 215 U.S. 252, ... ...
  • Chemetron Corp. v. Business Funds, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • August 16, 1982
    ...it abandons the requirement of mutuality; offensive collateral estoppel is itself nothing new. See, e.g., Mason Lumber Co. v. Buchtel, 101 U.S. 638, 25 L.Ed. 1073 (1880); 18 Wright & Miller, supra, § 4416, at 138 n.13. The majority fails to point to one word in Parklane that justifies its d......
  • The State ex rel. National Subway Company v. St. Louis
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • July 6, 1898
    ... ... 156; ... Forsyth v. Hammond, 17 U. S. S.Ct. 670; Cromwell ... v. Co. of Sac., 94 U.S. 351; Lumber Co. v ... Buchtel, 101 U.S. 638; Stout v. Lye, 103 U.S ... 66; Nesbit v. Independent Dist., 144 U.S. 610; ... Railroad v. Horton, 152 U.S. 252; Last Chance ... ...
  • Wiggins Ferry Company, And Respondent v. Chicago & Alton Railroad Company, And Respondent
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • April 30, 1895
    ... ... 32, 120, 371; Charles River Bridge v. Warren, 11 ... Peters, 544; Railroad v. Ryan, 11 Kan. 602; ... Railway v. Seely, 45 Mo. 512; State v ... Railroad, 83 Mo. 144; Fuller v. Dame, 18 Pick ... 472; Penn. Co. v. Railroad, 118 U.S. 290; Board ... 389; Railroad v. Wiggins Ferry ... Co., 119 U.S. 615; Wiggins Ferry Co. v ... Railroad, 142 U.S. 396; Lumber Company v ... Buchtel, 101 U.S. 638; Harmon v. Auditor, 123 ... Ill. 122; Mason v. Summers, 24 Mo.App. 174; Henry v ... Woods, 77 Mo. 280 ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT