South Carolina v. Taylor
| Docket Number | 28085 |
| Decision Date | 23 February 2022 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
State v. Lowery
...noting exceptions that excuse compliance with section 56-5-2953(A) are provided in section 56-5-2953(B) ). However, in State v. Taylor , 436 S.C. 28, 870 S.E.2d 168 (2022), our supreme court found a violation of the statute as to Miranda warnings no longer required a per se dismissal of the......
-
State v. Pray
... ... include the arrest ... of a person ... and show the person being advised of his ... Miranda rights." ... We ... affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following ... authorities: State v. Taylor, 436 S.C. 28, 34, 870 ... S.E.2d 168, 171 (2022), reh'g denied (Apr. 5, ... 2022) ("A question of statutory interpretation is a ... question of law, which is subject to de novo review and which ... [appellate courts] are free to decide without deference to ... the ... ...
-
State v. Huggins
... ... OF REVIEW ... Our ... appellate review in criminal cases is limited to correcting ... errors of law. City of Rock Hill v. Suchenski, 374 ... S.C. 12, 15, 646 S.E.2d 879, 880 (2007), abrogated on ... other grounds by State v. Taylor, 436 S.C. 28, 38, 870 ... S.E.2d 168, 173 (2022) ... LAW/ANALYSIS ... The ... State argues that Rule 74, SCRCP, rather than Title 18, ... should govern the time requirements for filing appeals from ... the magistrate court and ... ...