Santiago v. Streeval

Docket Number20-2665
Decision Date02 June 2022
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
25 cases
  • Cureton v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Illinois
    • March 31, 2023
    ...that the defendant knew he was prohibited from possessing a firearm. Knowledge of the relevant status is enough.” Santiago v. Streeval, 36 F.4th 700, 707 (7th Cir. 2022) (citing United States v. Maez, 960 F.3d 949 (7th Cir. 2020)); United States v. Cook, 970 F.3d 866, 880 (7th Cir. 2020). I......
  • Adkisson v. Jacobs Eng'g Grp., Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • June 13, 2022
  • Thomas v. Ciolli
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois
    • January 30, 2023
    ...provisions, a narrow alternative path to relief may be available under § 2255(e) (the “so-called ‘savings clause'”). Santiago v. Streeval, 36 F.4th 700, 705 (7th Cir. 2022). “The statutory savings clause, § 2255(e), permits another round of collateral review through a petition for habeas co......
  • Jefferson v. Williams
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Illinois
    • November 2, 2022
    ...that he knew that . . . his prior conviction[] was for a crime that carried a potential sentence of more than one year in prison.” Santiago, 36 F.4th at 707. Felony Conviction On May 31, 1994, Petitioner pled guilty to a Minnesota felony charge for witness tampering (Doc. 10-1, pp. 4-6, 41)......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT