Mills v. Facility Solutions Group
| Docket Number | B313943 |
| Decision Date | 01 November 2022 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
- GC Bros. Entm't LLC v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Bd.
-
Ruiz v. Conduent Commercial Sols.
...public policy. See Viking River, 142 S.Ct. at 1924-25; Piplack, 88 Cal.App.5th at 1287-88; Galarsa, 88 Cal.App.5th at 648-52; Mills, 84 Cal.App.5th at 1063. UDRP waives Ruiz's right to initiate or participate in any representative action. See Odle Dec. Exs. 1, 4. This is a broad waiver that......
-
Doucette v. Neutron Holdings, Inc.
...time limit conflicted with a longer statute of limitations provided by a remedial statute. See, e.g. , Mills v. Facility Solutions Grp., Inc. , 300 Cal. Rptr. 3d 833, 854 (Ct. App. 2022) (citing cases involving claims arising under wage and labor laws); Pinela v. Neiman Marcus Grp., Inc. , ......
-
Villanueva v. Maxim Healthcare Servs.
...whether the plaintiffs have demonstrated that the discovery limitations will prevent them from adequately arbitrating their statutory claims.” Id. (quotations and omitted). Villanueva challenges the portion of the arbitration agreement which states: “The Arbitrator shall have no authority t......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Mcle Self-study: Galarsa v. Dolgen Narrows Viking River on Arbitrability of Paga Claims
...action in any forum contributes to substantive unconscionability of arbitration agreement); Mills v. Facility Solutions Group, Inc., 84 Cal. App. 5th 1035, 1062 (2022) (holding that a waiver of all representative claims was one of numerous substantively unconscionable provisions in the at-i......
-
Adr Update
...provisions applied only to mandatory predispute arbitration agreements.UNCONSIONABILITY ANALYSIS Mills v. Facility Sols. Grp., Inc., 84 Cal. App. 5th 1035 (2022)In Mills, the Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's denial of a motion to compel arbitration based on unconscionability, and ......
-
Alternate Dispute Resolution Update
...plaintiff in the representative claim because he was an "aggrieved employee." See Howitson, supra, 81 Cal.App.5th at p. 488.15. (2022) 84 Cal.App.5th 1035, 1064.16. (2022) 85 Cal.App.5th 626, 635.17. (2022) 85 Cal.App.5th 983.18. (AAA).19. S274671.20. (2022) 142 S.Ct. 1708 (Morgan).21. See ......