Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London. v. Conagra Grocery Products Co.
Docket Number | A160548 |
Decision Date | 19 April 2022 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
Rose v. Cnty. of San Benito
... ... MOUs, covered the full premium cost of certain CalPERS' plans for "employee only" (individual) ... ...
-
The Sherwin-Williams Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
...in Ohio but has been litigated in two other jurisdictions - Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. ConAgra Grocery Prods. Co., LLC, 77 Cal.App. 5th 729, 292 Cal.Rptr.3d 712 (2022) ("the ConAgra Action") in California and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. NL Industries, Inc., N.Y.......
-
Cnty. of Sacramento v. Everest Nat'l Ins. Co.
...or others." California Insurance Code § 533 "is an implied exclusionary clause which by statute is to be read into all insurance policies." Certain at Lloyd's London v. ConAgra Grocery Prods. Co., 77 Cal.App. 5th 729, 739 (2022) (citation omitted) (emphasis in the original). The provision's......
1 firm's commentaries
-
Ninth Circuit Holds That California Insurance Code Section 533 Bars Indemnity Coverage for Employment Retaliation Claims
...is to be read into all insurance policies.” Id. at *1-2 (quoting Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London v. ConAgra Grocery Prods. Co., 77 Cal. App. 5th 729, 739 (2022) (emphasis in original)). The court held that the retaliation claims against the County were willful acts barred from indemn......
1 books & journal articles
-
Insurance Law
...Exchange of Automobile Club of Southern California (2009) 47 Cal.4th 302; with Gray v. Zurich Ins. Co. (1966) 65 Cal.2d 263.39. (2022) 77 Cal.App.5th 729 ("ConAgra").40. Id. at p. 721 (internal quotations omitted).41. (2021) 71 Cal.App.5th 688 ("Inns").42. (2022) 77 Cal.App.5th 753 ("Musso ......