Cardona-Franco v. Garland
| Docket Number | 19-60789 |
| Decision Date | 24 May 2022 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Kumar v. Garland
... ... Ashcroft , 260 F.3d 448, 451 (5th Cir. 2001). A motion to remand is "reserved for new evidence that is both material and was not available at the time of the underlying proceedings." Cardona-Franco v. Garland , 35 F.4th 359, 365 n.4 (5th Cir. 2022) (quotation marks and citation omitted); Ramchandani v. Gonzales , 434 F.3d 337, 340 n.6 (5th Cir. 2005) (explaining the requirements for motion to reopen and motion to remand are the same). Our review of the denial of a motion to remand is for ... ...
-
Kumar v. Garland
... ... v. Ashcroft , 260 F.3d 448, 451 (5th Cir. 2001). A motion ... to remand is "reserved for new evidence that is both ... material and was not available at the time of the underlying ... proceedings." Cardona-Franco v. Garland , 35 ... F.4th 359, 365 n.4 (5th Cir. 2022) (quotation marks and ... citation omitted); Ramchandani v. Gonzales , 434 F.3d ... 337, 340 n.6 (5th Cir. 2005) (explaining the requirements for ... motion to reopen and motion to remand are the same). Our ... ...
-
Miranda-Cruz v. Garland
...(5th Cir. 2020) (citation omitted). We review the IJ's decision to the extent it influenced the BIA's ruling. Cardona-Franco v. Garland, 35 F.4th 359, 363 (5th Cir. 2022) (citing Qorane v. Barr, 919 F.3d 904, 909 n.1 (5th Cir. 2019)). Petitioners, now joined by the Government,[2] argue the ......
-
Islam v. Garland
...rejection of his asylum, withholding, and CAT claims are reviewed under the substantial evidence standard. See Cardona-Franco v. Garland, 35 F.4th 359, 365 (5th Cir. 2022); Zhang v. Gonzales, 432 F.3d 339, 344 (5th Cir. 2005). Additionally, we consider the IJ's decision only insofar as it i......
Request a trial to view additional results