LaFace v. Ralphs Grocery Co.
| Docket Number | B305494 |
| Decision Date | 18 February 2022 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
16 cases
-
Estrada v. Royalty Carpet Mills, Inc.
...its behalf. The action is still subject to the same legal rights and interests as the state." ( LaFace v. Ralphs Grocery Company (2022) 75 Cal.App.5th 388, 401, 290 Cal.Rptr.3d 447 ( LaFace ).) "[A] PAGA litigant's status as ‘the proxy or agent’ of the state [citation] is not merely semanti......
- Ramirez v. Charter Commc'ns, Inc.
-
Hamilton v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
...; see also Estrada , 76 Cal. App. 5th at 712, 292 Cal.Rptr.3d 1 ; Zackaria , 142 F. Supp. 3d at 959 ; LaFace v. Ralphs Grocery Co. , 75 Cal. App. 5th 388, 401, 290 Cal.Rptr.3d 447 (2022). Dismissing a PAGA suit on such grounds would therefore "impose a barrier on such actions that the state......
-
Wing v. Chico Healthcare & Wellness Ctr., LP
...time, the employee may assert PAGA claims as a representative of the state. (§ 2699.3, subd. (a)(2) ; LaFace v. Ralphs Grocery Co. (2022) 75 Cal.App.5th 388, 394, 290 Cal.Rptr.3d 447.)4 In Valdez v. Terminix Int'l Co. Ltd. Partnership (9th Cir. 2017) 681 F.Appx. 592, 593, the Ninth Circuit ......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
Akin Gump Recaps A Momentous Year For PAGA
...that courts may stay overlapping PAGA cases under the exclusive concurrent jurisdiction doctrine; and LaFace v. Ralphs Grocery Co., 75 Cal. App. 5th 388 (2022), confirmed that PAGA confers no right to a jury While many of these decisions were clarifying, others created new controversies or ......
-
2022: A Momentous Year For PAGA
...that courts may stay overlapping PAGA cases under the exclusive concurrent jurisdiction doctrine; and LaFace v. Ralphs Grocery Co., 75 Cal. App. 5th 388 (2022), confirmed that PAGA confers no right to a jury While many of these decisions were clarifying, others created new controversies or ......
2 books & journal articles
-
Intellectual property
...willfullness; and defendant’s net worth. (Bus. & Prof. Code, §§17207, subd. (b); 17536, subd. (b).)” Laface v. Rahs Grocery Co. 75 Cal.App.5th 388, 399 (2022). §5:20 ELEMENTS §5:21 Trade Name “Trade name” means any name used by a person to identify a business or vocation of that person. Cal......
-
Wage and Hour Case Notes
...COURT OF APPEAL FINDS NO RIGHT TO JURY TRIAL IN PAGA ACTION AND CLARIFIES SUITABLE SEATING STANDARDLaFace v. Ralphs Grocery Co., 75 Cal. App. 5th 388 (2022)Resolving an issue disputed in PAGA cases for almost 18 years, the California Court of Appeal recently held there is no right to a jury......