Save the Hill Group v. City of Livermore
| Docket Number | A161573 |
| Decision Date | 30 March 2022 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
1 cases
-
Arcadians for Envtl. Pres. v. City of Arcadia
...of the substance of the objection so that it has an opportunity to evaluate and respond to it." (Stop Syar, at p. 453; accord, Save the Hill, at p. 1104.) "[B]land general references to environmental matters . . ., or isolated and unelaborated comment[s] do not satisfy the exhaustion requir......
7 firm's commentaries
-
California Supreme Court Denies Depublication Requests In Livermore CEQA Case Addressing “No Project” Alternative
...declined to review on its own motion, the First District Court of Appeal’s decision in Save the Hill Group v. City of Livermore (2022) 76 Cal.App.5th 1092, S. Ct. Case No. S274754; Ct. App. Case No. A161573. My May 26, 2022 post on the League of Cities’ and CSAC’s depublication requests, wh......
-
EIR Invalidated for Failure to Analyze Potential Public Acquisition of Residentially Zoned Land
...analyze the possibility that public funds might be used to acquire the land for open space. Save the Hill Group v. City of Livermore, 76 Cal. App. 5th 1092 (2022). The project site was zoned residential and was the last remaining undeveloped area in that section of the city. The 32-acre sit......
-
Sixth District Holds Downtown San Jose Office Project FSEIR’s Brief Discussion And Rejection of “Compensatory” Mitigation for Historic Buildings Razed By Project Was Informationally Adequate Under CEQA Based On City’s Unchallenged Factual Finding That No Similar Historic Buildings Existed Elsewhere In City’s Downtown
...mitigation for projects impacting biological resources and agricultural lands (see, Save the Hill Group v. City of Livermore (2022) 76 Cal.App.5th 1092, 1116, my 4/4/22 post on which can be found here; Preserve Wild Santee v. City of Santee (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 260, 274, my 11/28/12 post ......
-
CEQA YEAR IN REVIEW — 2022
...Invalidated for Failure to Analyze Potential Public Acquisition of Residentially Zoned Land Save the Hill Group v. City of Livermore,76 Cal. App. 5th 1092 (2022) The EIR for a residential project was found legally inadequate because its discussion of project alternatives did not analyze the......
Request a trial to view additional results