Chase v. Belden
Citation | 9 N.E. 852,104 N.Y. 86 |
Parties | CHASE and another, Ex'rs, etc., v. BELDEN. |
Decision Date | 18 January 1887 |
Court | New York Court of Appeals |
This is an appeal from a judgment of the general term of the Third department, affirming a judgment of nonsuit on the trial of the issues before Justice OSBORN and a jury at the Ulster circuit. The action was originally brought by William Donahue, the testator of the present plaintiffs, to recover the value of the steam-boat Charlotte Vanderbilt, from William Belden, the respondent, owner of the steam-yacht Yosemite, for the running down of the Vanderbilt by the Yosemite near Esopus Meadow light-house, on the Hudson river, at between 9 and 10 o'clock in the evening of July 14, 1882. The value of the Vanderbilt was admitted to be $16,000, and that she was a total loss. The Vanderbilt was a freight and passenger steam-boat, running between Albany and New York, on the Hudson river, and at the time of the collision was on her way to the city of New York. The Yosemite was an iron steam pleasure yacht, of 481 tons burden, with two masts, and having sails, which were furled at the time of the collision. When the collision happened she was under steam, on a trip from New York to Catskill, and proceeding at the rate of about 16 miles an hour. She carried the usual red and green lights, and at her foremast a white light, corresponding in character and position with the lights prescribed for ocean-going steamers, and steamers carrying sail, by section 4233, rule 3, Rev. St. U. S. She was enrolled in conformity with title 50, entitled ‘Regulation of Vessels in Domestic Commerce,’ of the Revised Statutes of the United States, and was licensed, in pursuance of Chapter 2, tit. 48, of the same statutes, ‘exclusively as a pleasure vessel, and designed as a model of naval architecture,’ with leave ‘to proceed from port to port of the United States, and by sea to foreign ports, without entering or clearing at the custom-house, but not to be allowed to transport merchandise, or any passengers for pay.’
There is a great mass of evidence in respect to the circumstances of the collision-on the part of the plaintiff for the purpose of showing that the collision was caused by the negligence of the Yosemite, and especially from her failure to carry the proper lights; and on the part of the defendant to show that it was caused by the mismanagement and neglect of the Vanderbilt. The court, at the conclusion of the case, nonsuited the plaintiffs, on the ground that no negligence had been shown on the part of the defendant; and especially that the principal ground of negligence on the part of the defendant relied upon by the plaintiffs, viz., that the Yosemite did not carry the proper lights, was not true,-the court holding that she did carry at the time the lights required.
As the case turns upon the question of lights, it is only necessary, in addition to the foregoing facts, to state the rules, as to lights upon steamvessels, prescribed by section 4233 of the Revised Statutes of the United States, so far as material here:
P. Cantine and Hallock, Jennings & Chase, for appellants, Chase and another, Ex'rs, etc.
Luther R. Marsh, for respondent, Belden.
The plaintiffs were nonsuited on the ground that the Yosemite, at the time of the collision, had the proper lights, and that no negligence was imputable to her on any other ground. This ruling was affirmed by the general term.
The right of the defendant to maintain this judgment must, we think, turn upon the correctness of the ruling that the Yosemite carried the proper lights. The counsel for ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Proctor v. Dillon
...to the plaintiff. The case was tried in the State courts and ultimately resulted in a final judgment in favor of the plaintiff. Chase v. Belden, 104 N.Y. 86; S. C. 16 N. Y. Rep. 528, affirmed in 117 N.Y. 637. The case then went to the Supreme Court of the United States by writ of error. It ......
- Appleby v. Estates of Appleby
- Appleby v. Appleby's Estate (In re Appleby's Estate)
-
Belden v. Chase
...affirmed by the general term, and upon appeal to the court of appeals the judgment was reversed, and the cause remanded. Chase v. Belden, 104 N. Y. 86, 9 N. E. 852. The case was then tried a third time, and a verdict rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, and judgment entered thereon for $27,......