Stewart v. Lansing
Decision Date | 01 October 1881 |
Citation | 104 U.S. 505,26 L.Ed. 866 |
Parties | STEWART v. LANSING |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. James R. Cox for the plaintiff.
Mr. Francis Kernan for the defendant.
This was a suit by John J. Stewart to recover the interest due on coupons which matured July 1, 1872, Jan. 1, 1873, Jan. 1, 1874, July 1, 1874, Jan. 1, 1875, July 1, 1875, Jan. 1, 1876, and July 1, 1876. They were attached to seventy-five bonds of $1,000 each, purporting to have been issued by the town of Lansing, under the authority of a statute of New York, passed May 18, 1869, to permit municipal corporations to aid in the construction of railroads. The defence, stated generally, was that the bonds had been issued without authority of law. At the trial, after the testimony on both sides was in, the court instructed the jury to find a verdict for the town, which was done, and judgment entered accordingly. This ruling furnishes the principal ground of error assigned here.
The testimony is all set out in the bill of exceptions. The undisputed facts are that the county judge of Tompkins County, within which the town is situated, assuming to act under the authority of that statute, rendered, March 21, 1871, a judgment appointing commissioners to execute bonds of the town to the amount of $75,000, and invest them in the capital stock of the Cayuga Lake Railroad Company. On the 27th of the same month, at the instance of the opposing taxpayers of the town, a writ of certiorari, directed to the county judge, was issued from the Suprene Court of the State for a review of this judgment. This writ was, at or about its date, served on the judge, who, on the 1st of September, made his return thereto, sending up, as required by law, a transcript of the record of the proceedings before him which were brought under review. Of this writ, and what was done thereunder, both the commissioners appointed by the judge and the railroad company had full notice; but the commissioners, on or about the 14th of October, 1871, executed the bonds which had been authorized, payable to bearer on the first day of January, 1902, with coupons for semi-annual instalments of interest attached, and delivered them to the company in exchange for seven hundred and fifty shares of its capital stock. At the same time the commissioners took from the company a bond of indemnity to save them harmless from all costs, liabilities, or expenses on account of what had been done.
The bonds, as soon as delivered, were taken by the company to New York, and there pledged as collateral security for money borrowed. On the 27th of May, 1872, the Supreme Court in general term reversed and in all things held for naught the judgment of the county judge appointing commissioners and authorizing the issue of the bonds. This judgment of the Supreme Court still remains in force.
On the 26th of November, 1872, the company arranged with Elliott, Collins, & Co., a banking firm in Philadelphia, for the money to take up the bonds in New York, and they again pledged the bonds to that firm as security for the advances made. On the 8th of February, 1873, this debt to Elliott, Collins, & Co. was paid, and they parted with the bonds. The entire testimony as to what took place at this time is as follows:——
William Elliott, the senior member of the firm, examined as a witness, said:
On cross-examination, he said: This testimony was taken on behalf of the plaintiff, by deposition, on the 18th of July, 1876.
Afterwards, on the 18th of August in the same year, another deposition of the same witness was taken in behalf of the plaintiff. In this deposition, looking at Exhibit D, which was as follows:
he said: On cross-examination, he said:
Talmadge Delafield, the treasurer of the company, a witness called on the part of the plaintiff, testified that Elliott, Collins, & Co. held the bonds after the transfer to them until Feb. 8, 1873, when they rendered an account of the sale. On cross-examination he said,
On the 30th of May, 1874, a suit was brought in the name of Stewart, the present plaintiff in error, in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York, to recover the coupons due July 1, 1873, averring his ownership thereof.
On the 20th of July, 1872, Manassah Bailey brought suit in the same court to recover the coupons of July 1, 1872. In each of the suits the defences were that the bonds and coupons were issued without the authority of law, and that the plaintiffs respectively were not bona fide holders. The suits were tried together, and upon the same...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
First Trust & Savings Bank v. Iowa-Wisconsin Bridge Co.
...with fraud. The court also found that there had been no showing that any of these bondholders were bona fide purchasers. Stewart v. Lansing, 104 U.S. 505, 26 L.Ed. 866. Iowa Code § 9519. If these findings are correct the decree is proper. Under the circumstances we think there is no room fo......
-
First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Muskogee v. Heilman
...he is a bona fide holder in due course. Thompson v. Sioux Falls Nat. Bank, 150 U. S. 231, 14 S. Ct. 94, 37 L. Ed. 1063; Stewart v. Lansing, 104 U. S. 505, 26 L. Ed. 866; Smith v. Sac County, 11 Wall. 139, 147, 20 L. Ed. The authorities, however, are not in accord as to what is required to m......
-
McKnight v. Parsons
...71 Conn. 172, 41 Atl. 546; Monroe v. Cooper, 5 Pick. (Mass.) 412;Smith v. Sac Co., 11 Wall. (U. S.) 139, 20 L. Ed. 102;Stewart v. Lansing, 104 U. S. 505, 26 L. Ed. 866;Landauer v. Sioux Falls, 10 S. D. 205, 72 N. W. 467;Bank v. Boddicker, 105 Iowa, 548, 75 N. W. 632, 45 L. R. A. 321, 67 Am.......
-
McKnight v. Parsons
...Conn. 172 (41 A. 546); Monroe v. Cooper, 5 Pick. 412; Smith v. Sac Co., 78 U.S. 139, 11 Wall. (U.S.), 139 (20 L.Ed. 102) Stewart v. Lansing, 104 U.S. 505 (26 L.Ed. 866); Landauer v. Sioux Falls, 10 S.D. 205 (72 N.W. Bank v. Boddicker, 105 Iowa 548, 75 N.W. 632; Sullivan v. Langley, 120 Mass......