R&J Holding Co. v. Redevelopment Auth.of the Cnty of Montgomery
| Docket Number | 10-1047 |
| Decision Date | 09 December 2011 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
71 cases
-
Brown v. Tucci
...of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently recognized that § 26(1) is followed in Pennsylvania. R & J Holding Co. v. Redevelopment Authority of the County of Montgomery, 670 F.3d 420, 427 (3d Cir.2011). It is doubtful that the Pennsylvania courts would find Brown's official-capacity claims t......
-
Adams ex rel. Adams v. Springmeyer
...against Springmeyer. See Free Speech Coal., Inc. v. Attorney Gen. of U.S., 2012 WL 1255056, at R & J Holding Co. v. Redevelopment Auth. of County of Montgomery, 670 F.3d 420, 424 (3d Cir. 2011). Plaintiffs have stated that Defendant Springmeyer was a state actor "to the extent that she was ......
-
Davis v. State (In re Venoco LLC)
...to just compensation, including the fair market and fair rental value of the [Onshore Facility]."); R & J Holding Co. v. Redevelopment Auth. , 670 F.3d 420, 433 n.10 (3d Cir. 2011) (explaining that seeking "compensation for ... inability to fully utilize, develop, and sell their property ........
-
Phila. Entm't & Dev. Partners, L.P. v. Commonwealth (In re Phila. Entm't & Dev. Partners, L.P.)
...is not necessary: (1) Bradley v. Pittsburgh Board of Education, 913 F.2d 1064 (3d Cir.1990) and (2) in R & J Holding, Inc. v. County of Montgomery, 670 F.3d 420 (3d Cir.2011). Neither case is applicable.In Bradley, the Third Circuit addressed whether a plaintiff's reservation of right to la......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Recent Developments in Regulatory Takings
...owner, arguing that Williamson County does not require a takings plaintiff to attempt to change the law to ripen her claim.[186] . 670 F.3d 420 (3d Cir. 2011).[187] . In re Condemnation of 110 Washington Street, 767 A.2d 1154 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2001).[188] . R &J Holding, 670 F.3d at 423.[189]......