AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion
| Docket Number | 09-893 |
| Decision Date | 27 April 2011 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
4086 cases
-
Bacon v. Avis Budget Grp., Inc.
...Ltd. P'ship v. Clark , ––– U.S. ––––, 137 S.Ct. 1421, 1426, 197 L.Ed.2d 806 (2017) (quoting AT & T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion , 563 U.S. 333, 341, 131 S.Ct. 1740, 179 L.Ed.2d 742 (2011) ) (sarcasm in original). So the court, in applying contract law, must keep in mind not only the general "......
-
Germaine Judge v. Nijjar Realty, Inc.
...a class-wide basis” and to stay the action “pending the completion of arbitral proceedings.” Citing AT & T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion (2011) 563 U.S. 333, 131 S.Ct. 1740, 179 L.Ed.2d 742 and Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. AnimalFeeds Int'l Corp. (2010) 559 U.S. 662, 130 S.Ct. 1758, 176 L.Ed.2d 605 (......
-
Luchini v. Carmax, Inc.
...only to arbitration or that derive their meaning from the fact that an agreement to arbitrate is at issue." AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, __ U.S. _, 131 S.Ct. 1740, 1746 (2011) (quoting Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Casarotto, 517 U.S. 681, 687, 116 S.Ct. 1652 (1996)). There is no meaning......
-
Castillo v. Cleannet USA, Inc.
...v. Mercury Constr. Corp. , 460 U.S. 1, 24, 103 S.Ct. 927, 74 L.Ed.2d 765 (1983) and citing AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion ("Concepcion "), 563 U.S. 333, 339, 131 S.Ct. 1740, 179 L.Ed.2d 742 (2011) ). Because arbitration is a matter of contract, the question of arbitrability is, in principl......
Get Started for Free
343 firm's commentaries
-
Class Action Waivers and the Arbitrability of Antitrust Claims—Charting the Likely Ramifications of AMEX III
...III.4 II. Background A. The Federal Substantive Law of Arbitrability and the Effective Vindication of Federal Statutory Rights Doctrine In Concepcion, the Court’s preemption analysis focused on how courts should respond when the application of state law rule or doctrine acts as an obstacle ......
-
The International Comparative Legal Guide to International Arbitration 2013 - Chapter 64: USA
...displaced by the FAA”. Marmet Health Care Ctr., Inc. v. Brown, -U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1201, 1203 (2012) (quoting AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, -U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 1740, 1747 (2011)); see also Concepcion, 131 S.Ct. at 1746 (“The final phrase of [Section 2 of the FAA] … permits agreements to ar......
-
Class Arbitrations Under Attack—But Survive
...no mention of class arbitration; Luchini v. Carmax, Inc., 2012 WL 3862150 (E.D. Cal. 2012). 7AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 131 S. Ct. 1740 at 1751, 179 L.Ed.2d 742 (2011). 8N. M. S. A. 1978, § 44-7A-11 9Lyndoe v. D.R. Horton, Inc., 2012-NMCA-103, 287 P.3d 357 (N.M. Ct. App. 2012), ce......
-
Litigation & Dispute Resolution 2019 – Eighth Edition - U.S. Chapter
...favoring arbitration agreements, notwithstanding any state substantive or procedural policies to the contrary”. AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 131 563 U.S. 333, 346–47 (2011). The FAA declares all arbitration agreements “valid, irrevocable, and enforceable” as a matter of federal law. 9 U......
Get Started for Free
266 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...F. Supp. 482 (W.D. Pa. 1973), 36 Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp., 472 U.S. 585 (1985), 170 AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion, 131 S. Ct. 1740 (2011), 113, 115, 117, 118 AT&T Tech. v. Commc’ns Workers, 475 U.S. 643 (1986), 111 AT&T v. IMR Capital Corp., 888 F. Supp. 221, 256 (D. M......
-
"BECAUSE IT IS WRONG": AN ESSAY ON THE IMMORALITY AND ILLEGALITY OF THE ONLINE SERVICE CONTRACTS OF GOOGLE AND FACEBOOK.
...2007). (598) Aral v. Earthlink, Inc., 36 Cal. Rptr. 3d 229, 238 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005), abrogated by AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333 (2011) (holding that the Federal Arbitration Act preempts California's judicial rule regarding the unconscionability of class action arbitrati......
-
Construction Home-Court Statutes: Scope, Enforcement, and Preemption Under the Federal Arbitration Act
...https://www.jonesday.com/en/insights/2022/04/ homecourt-rules-and-construction-disputes-an-update. 5. See, e.g., AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333, 344 (2011). Recently, a federal district court in Ohio invoked the doctrine of substantive unconscionability to sever and not enfor......
-
Diffusing disputes: the public in the private of arbitration, the private in courts, and the erasure of rights.
...action, claims will not be brought. See, e.g., Am. Express Co. v. Italian Colors Rest., 133 S. Ct. 2304 (2013); AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 131 S. Ct. 1740 (2011), discussed infra notes 370-373, 422-437, 441-445 and accompanying text. Justice Scalia has also questioned the extent to wh......
Get Started for Free