105 A. 893 (N.J.L. 1918), Hill v. Bugbee

Citation:105 A. 893, 92 N.J.L. 514
Opinion Judge:PER CURIAM.
Party Name:LOUIS W. HILL, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF JAMES J. HILL, APPELLANT, v. NEWTON A. K. BUGBEE, COMPTROLLER, &c., ET AL., RESPONDENTS
Attorney:For the appellant, Coult & Smith. For the respondents, John W. Wescott, attorney-general.
Judge Panel:For affirmance -- THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, SWAYZE, TRENCHARD, MINTURN, KALISCH, HEPPENHEIMER, WILLIAMS, TAYLOR, GARDNER, JJ. 10. For reversal -- None.
Case Date:October 11, 1918
Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey
 
FREE EXCERPT

Page 893

105 A. 893 (N.J.L. 1918)

92 N.J.L. 514

LOUIS W. HILL, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF JAMES J. HILL, APPELLANT,

v.

NEWTON A. K. BUGBEE, COMPTROLLER, &c., ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Court of Errors and Appeals of New Jersey

October 11, 1918

Argued June 24, 1918.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 91 N.J.L. 454.

For the appellant, Coult & Smith.

For the respondents, John W. Wescott, attorney-general.

OPINION

[92 N.J.L. 515] PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bergen in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance -- THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, SWAYZE, TRENCHARD, MINTURN, KALISCH, HEPPENHEIMER, WILLIAMS, TAYLOR, GARDNER, JJ. 10.

For reversal -- None.

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP