Anderson v. May
Decision Date | 11 January 1952 |
Citation | 107 N.E.2d 358,91 Ohio App. 557 |
Parties | , 62 Ohio Law Abs. 324, 48 O.O. 132 ANDERSON v. MAY. |
Court | Ohio Court of Appeals |
J. L. MacDonald, Lisbon, for plaintiff-appellee.
F. W. Springer, East Palestine, Ralph Atkinson, Attorney at Law, Salem, for defendant-appellant.
The appellant, Leona Anderson May, is seeking the reversal of the judgment of the Probate Court of Columbiana County, Ohio, entered on the 21st day of September, 1951. That Court allowed a writ of Habeas Corpus ordering the three minor children of Leona Anderson May and Owen Anderson, released to the custody of the father.
The Habeas Corpus proceeding is based upon a decree of a county court of Waukesha County, Wisconsin, wherein the custody and control of the children was awarded to the father, the relator in this case. The appeal was filed on questions of law and fact, but it has been submitted to this Court by counsel upon questions of law only, it appearing that the action is not a chancery case. The following facts were stipulated:
'That the defendant, Leona Anderson May, is a native of the State of Wisconsin and that the plaintiff and defendant were married in the State of Wisconsin and were residents of and domiciled in that state up to the latter part of the month of December, 1946, at which time the defendant left the State of Wisconsin with the aforesaid children and came to the State of Ohio; that the said children which are the subject of this action in Habeas Corpus, to-wit: Ronald Anderson, Sandra Anderson, and James Anderson, were born in the State of Wisconsin and at all times resided in that State with their parents, plaintiff and defendant, up until the latter part of December, 1946, at which time the defendant brought them into the State of Ohio; that the plaintiff, Owen Anderson, at all times has been and is now a resident of and domiciled at Waukesha County in the State of Wisconsin.
'That said defendant, Leona Anderson May established a separate domicile in the State of Ohio the latter part of December, 1946, and has ever since that time been domiciled in Lisbon, Columbiana County, Ohio.
'That no further legal proceedings of record have been filed in said divorce case since the aforesaid divorce decree was entered.
Testimony of Mrs. May and Mr. Anderson was taken and so far as the issues in this case are concerned, that is all the record that is pertinent to the solution of the instant problem. The conduct of the father and the mother of the children following the Probate Court's announcement of its decision, reprehensible as that conduct may be on the part of each, has no bearing on the decision of this case.
The testimony of the father and mother bears directly upon the conditions under which Mrs. May took the children from Wisconsin to Ohio.
Mr. Anderson testified:
Mrs. May testified that at the time she left Wisconsin the children's ages were 8 years, 5 years, and 18 months.
From the record before us, it is apparent that Leona Anderson May was a native of Waukesha, Wisconsin that she and Owen Anderson were married in the middle thirties and took up residence in Waukesha where they lived their entire married life. Their domicil and permanent home, freely chosen by both, was fixed in Waukesha up to December 26, 1946; that on December 26, 1946, Leona Anderson May left Waukesha with the three children and came directly to Lisbon, Ohio, where she established her domicil. That she brought the children to Lisbon with the knowledge and consent of the father to think over her domestic differences with her husband, and decide whether she would longer live with him. That on New Year's Day she told her husband she was not coming back. That the father thereupon, requested the return of the children as he had stated to the mother that the matter of their custody 'was up to the Court.'
That on January 6, 1947, Owen Anderson filed his action in Waukesha for divorce and custody of the children and said divorce was granted to him on February 5, 1947, which decree was made in the absence of the mother and the children from the State of Wisconsin and without service of jurisdiction over them other than the substituted service in the divorce case.
The Court awarded custody of the children to the father. The only service made on Leona Anderson May in the divorce case was through the Sheriff of Columbiana County, Ohio, who served her with summons and a copy of the petition. That no personal service of any nature was made upon Leona Anderson May in the State of Wisconsin. That neither she nor the children were in Wisconsin...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
May v. Anderson
...order has been held in abeyance and the children are still with her. The Court of Appeals for Columbiana County, Ohio, affirmed. 91 Ohio App. 557, 107 N.E.2d 358. The Supreme Court of Ohio, without opinion, denied a motion directing the Court of Appeals to certify its record for review, and......
-
E. Cleveland v. Landingham
...which are usually expressed in Latin as factum and animus, or residence and intention to remain. See Anderson v. May (1951), 91 Ohio App. 557, 48 O.O. 132, 107 N.E.2d 358, reversed on other grounds (1953), 345 U.S. 528, 73 S.Ct. 840, 97 L.Ed. 1221. While the law remains that a person retain......
-
Bowman v. Bowman
...common-law rule. In the instant case, both parents were domiciled in and resided in Akron, Summit County, Ohio. See: Anderson v. May, 91 Ohio App. 557, 107 N.E.2d 358, reversed on other grounds, May v. Anderson, 345 U.S. 528, 73 S.Ct. 840, 97 L.Ed. 1221; Yarborough v. Yarborough, 290 U.S. 2......
-
City of East Cleveland v. Jack Landingham
...essential elements, which are usually expressed in Latin as fact urn and animus, or residence and intention to remain. See Anderson v. May (1951), 91 Ohio App. 557, dism'd for want of debat. question (1952), 157 Ohio 436, revd. on other grounds (1953), 345 U.S. 528, 97 L.Ed. 1221, 73 S.Ct. ......