108 U.S. 24 (1883), St. Louis, I.M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Southern Express Co.

Citation:108 U.S. 24, 2 S.Ct. 6, 27 L.Ed. 638
Party Name:'EXPRESS COMPANIES' CASES.' ST. LOUIS, I. M. & S. RY. CO. v. SOUTHERN EXPRESS CO.
Case Date:January 29, 1883
Court:United States Supreme Court
 
FREE EXCERPT

Page 24

108 U.S. 24 (1883)

2 S.Ct. 6, 27 L.Ed. 638

'EXPRESS COMPANIES' CASES.'

ST. LOUIS, I. M. & S. RY. CO.

v.

SOUTHERN EXPRESS CO.

United States Supreme Court.

January 29, 1883

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri.* On motion to dismiss.

* See 10 F. 210, 869.

COUNSEL

[2 S.Ct. 6] Jas. O. Broadhead, John F. Dillon, and Wager Swayne, for appellant.

S. F. Glover, John R. Shepley, S. M. Breckinridge, and Clarence A. Seward, for appellee.

OPINION

WAITE, C. J.

The Southern Express Company, an express carrier, filed its bill in equity against the St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company, in the circuit court for the eastern district of Missouri, to enjoin the railway company from interfering with or disturbing the express company in the enjoyment of the facilities it then had for the transaction of its express business over the railway company's railroad, so long as the

Page 25

express company conformed to the regulations of the railway company and paid all lawful charges for the business. A preliminary injunction was asked for, and, in this connection, the bill prayed that if any dispute or disagreement should arise between the parties during the pendency of the suit, upon the question of compensation to be paid for transportation, the express company might be permitted to bring the same before the court for decision by way of an interlocutory application. On the filing of the bill the preliminary injunction was granted, which was afterwards modified in some particulars affecting the compensation to be paid and the mode of doing the business.

[2 S.Ct. 7] On the twenty-fifth of March, 1882, the court entered a decree containing the following provisions:

'(5) That it is the duty of the defendant to carry the express matter of the plaintiff's company, and the messengers or agents in charge thereof, at a just and reasonable rate of compensation, and that such rate of compensation is to be found and established as a unit, and is to include as well the transportation of such messengers or agents as of the express matter in their custody and under their control.'

'(10) Whereas, it is alleged by complainant that since the commencement of this suit, and the service of the preliminary order of injunction herein, the defendant has, in violation of said...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP