Maryland Casualty Co. v. Stark
Decision Date | 04 January 1940 |
Docket Number | No. 9225.,9225. |
Citation | 109 F.2d 212 |
Parties | MARYLAND CASUALTY CO. v. STARK. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Geo. B. Thatcher, Wm. Woodburn, Wm. J. Forman, and Thatcher & Woodburn, all of Reno, Nev., for appellant.
Lester D. Summerfield, of Reno, Nev., for appellee.
Before DENMAN, MATHEWS, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court in a jury-waived case on a policy insuring the deceased, Charles William Stark.
The policy stated the insurance to be:
The following exceptive provision was set forth in the policy: "This policy shall not cover * * * death * * * caused or contributed to directly or indirectly, wholly or partly, by bodily or mental infirmity, ptomaines, bacterial infections (except pyogenic infections which shall occur simultaneously with and through an accidental cut or wound * * *) or by any other kind of disease * * *."
The appellant contends that the evidence does not support the following finding of the court: ; and that the court erred in refusing to find as requested that:
The body of the insured was found floating in the flowing water of an irrigation ditch, 1,200 feet down current from a bridge across it. This bridge was of concrete and was guarded by two concrete abutments on the east and west sides. At the northerly end of each abutment was a space of about four feet which was left unguarded as to the ditch. The parties agree that the deceased fell from the bridge into the ditch at the point where it was not guarded. There were no witnesses to the falling nor to what happened to the deceased from 8:15 a. m. when he was seen leaving his office near the bridge until his body was found in the ditch at 8:30 a. m.
Appellant states the sole issue of fact made by the pleadings and tried before the court to be "whether the deceased died accidentally, independently and exclusively of all other causes, or whether bodily or mental infirmity or disease caused or contributed to, wholly or partly, directly or indirectly, his death." It makes no contention of suicide.
On the day of the death an autopsy was conducted. The autopsy report stated ...
To continue reading
Request your trial- National Labor Relations Bd. v. Sterling Elec. Motors
-
National Labor R. Board v. Sterling Electric Motors
...activities, for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection." We are in agreement with Judge Healy's statement (109 F.2d 212) that these cease and desist orders (a) and (c) are "calculated to protect the employees, not to overthrow their Association; hence the pre......