People v. Brown

Decision Date30 June 1850
Citation11 Ill. 478,1850 WL 4245,1 Peck 478
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, on the relation of William Davenportv.WELCOME B. BROWN, judge, WILLIAM E. BUCKINGHAM and WILLIAM C. POYNTER, Associate Justices, and EDGAR BABCOCK, Clerk of the County Court of Woodford County.
CourtIllinois Supreme Court

11 Ill. 478
1850 WL 4245 (Ill.)
1 Peck (IL) 478

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, on the relation of William Davenport
v.
WELCOME B. BROWN, judge, WILLIAM E. BUCKINGHAM and WILLIAM C. POYNTER, Associate Justices, and EDGAR BABCOCK, Clerk of the County Court of Woodford County.

Supreme Court of Illinois.

June Term, 1850.


This was a petition for a peremptory mandamus, filed by the appellants, to the end that the county judge of Woodford county, and his associate justices and their clerk, might be commanded

[11 Ill. 479]

to make and transmit an abstract of the votes, etc., of that county, to the auditor of state, and that notices, etc., be given, designating a suitable time and place for holding an election in each of the towns of said county, for the purpose of organizing the same, etc.

The appellees, on showing cause, denied that a majority of the votes of those entitled to vote upon the question, had been cast for township organization. That at the general election at which the votes upon the question were given, upwards of six hundred legal votes were cast, and that only one hundred and fifty-three of the number were for township organization.

Upon a hearing of the parties, the court, Davis, judge, presiding, denied the petition; thereupon the relator prayed this appeal. Other questions were raised by the petition and answer, but as they were not considered in the opinion, reference will not be made to them. The error assigned was, the judgment of the court dismissing the petition.

O. PETERS, for appellants.

N. H. PURPLE, for appellees.

TREAT, C. J.

The sixth section of the seventh article of the constitution declares, that “the general assembly shall provide, by a general law, for a township organization, under which any county may organize, whenever a majority of the voters of such county, at any general election, shall so determine; and whenever any county shall adopt a township organization, so much of this constitution as provides for the management of the fiscal concerns of the said county by the county court, may be dispensed with; and the affairs of said county may be transacted in such manner as the general assembly may provide.”

On the 12th of February, 1849, the legislature passed a law, entitled “an act to provide for township and county organization, under which any county may organize whenever a majority of voters of such county, at any general election, shall so determine.” The first section of the act provides, “that at the next general...

To continue reading

Request your trial
37 cases
  • In re Denny
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • 1 February 1901
    ... ... For this purpose the above-mentioned act was passed, which provides that there shall be a vote taken by the people at the next general election, to be held on November 6, 1900, on the adoption or rejection of the proposed amendments; that the clerks of the circuit ... The following decisions are directly in point: People v. Town of Berkeley, 102 Cal. 298, 36 Pac. 591, 23 L. R. A. 838;People v. Brown, 11 Ill. 478; Same v. Garner, 47 Ill. 246; Same v. Wiant, 48 Ill. 263;Chestnutwood v. Rood, 68 Ill. 132;Belknap v. City of Louisville, 99 Ky. 474, 36 ... ...
  • Green v. State Board of Canvassers
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • 24 December 1896
    ... ... Under ... provisions of the constitution an amendment will carry when ... it is properly submitted to the people, and a majority of ... those voting upon the question cast their ballots in its ... favor, regardless of the number of voters voting upon other ... Davis, 57 Tex. 225, 234.) Indifference is not the test; ... an active and expressed approval is necessary. ( Duke v ... Brown, 96 N.C. 127, 131, 1 S.E. 873; Bayard v ... Klinge, 16 Minn. 249; Taylor v. Taylor, 10 ... Minn. 81; Everitt v. Smith, 22 Minn. 53; People ... ...
  • State ex inf. Major v. Kansas City
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 2 March 1911
    ... ... Kansas City, 103 Mo. 145; Dunn v. Lott, 67 ... Ark. 591; Blair v. Brooks, 22 L. R. A. (N. S.) 478; ... In re Denny, 156 Ind. 104; People ex rel. v ... Brown, 11 Ill. 478. (2) Whether the vote on the ... extension came up to the constitutional requirement or not, ... it was clearly ... ...
  • In re Denny
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • 1 February 1901
    ... ... For this purpose, the above ... mentioned act was passed, which provides: "That there ... shall be a vote taken by the people at the next general ... election " to be held on November 6, 1900, on the ... adoption or rejection of the proposed amendments; that the ... following decisions are directly in point: People v ... Town of Berkeley, 102 Cal. 298, 36 P. 591, 23 L. R ... A. 838; People v. Brown, 11 Ill. 478; ... People v. Garner, 47 Ill. 246; ... People v. Wiant, 48 Ill. 263; ... Chestnutwood v. Hood, 68 Ill. 132; ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT