United States v. 52 Drums Maple Syrup, 264.

Citation110 F.2d 914
Decision Date08 April 1940
Docket NumberNo. 264.,264.
PartiesUNITED STATES v. 52 DRUMS MAPLE SYRUP, etc.
CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)

Joseph A. McNamara, U. S. Atty., of Burlington, Vt., and Charles F. Ryan, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Rutland, Vt., for plaintiff-appellant.

Arthur L. Graves and William S. Burrage, both of St. Johnsbury, Vt., for claimant-appellee.

Before L. HAND, CHASE, and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

CHASE, Circuit Judge.

The appellant is here seeking the reversal of judgments for the claimant in condemnation proceedings under the Pure Food and Drugs Act on the sole ground that during a trial by jury reversible error was committed in the admission of evidence offered by the claimant.

The government seized at St. Johnsbury, Vt., a number of steel drums containing maple syrup which had concededly been shipped there at various times in interstate commerce in carload lots with other drums of such syrup. Libels in proceedings for the condemnation of the syrup under the provisions of the Pure Food and Drugs Act (Secs. 8(5) and 14 of 21 U.S.C.A.) were duly filed and the appellee, appearing as the claimant of all the syrup, answered each libel. The several proceedings were consolidated for trial by jury in the district court where a verdict was returned for the claimant in each proceeding and judgment thereon entered. This appeal followed. There was the same consolidation of causes for hearing on appeal.

The claimant processes maple sugar and syrup and manufactures maple sugar products therefrom at its plant in St. Johnsbury, Vt. It bought the maple syrup which was seized outside Vermont and caused it to be shipped to its plant at St. Johnsbury to be used as a raw material in its business but not to be sold or otherwise used until it had been processed.

The evidence clearly established that in making maple syrup by evaporating water from the maple sap rather minute amounts of lead do get into the syrup from lead in the paint and in the solder and sometimes, perhaps, in the composition, of the utensils used in the process. This lead is a poisonous substance and a comparatively small amount will make the syrup, which is a food within the meaning of the statute, a food dangerous to health. The government has established what is called a working tolerance of .025 grains of lead per pound which for present purposes may be treated as the maximum amount of lead maple syrup may contain without being barred from interstate shipment.

It was claimed by the government that the syrup which was seized contained, when shipped in interstate commerce, added lead to an amount which made it an adulterated food within the meaning of Sec. 8 (5) of 21 U.S.C.A., and subject to seizure and condemnation when moved in interstate commerce. The claimant denied that the government's proof was sufficient to establish the claimed adulteration and also contended that the statute did not apply to the seizures for other reasons of which we need now...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • United States v. Fishman
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. Southern District of New York
    • July 7, 2023
    ......Def. Second Brief at 9;. See Fishman Decl. ¶ 52; SGX-2000 . For. all of these reasons, the defense ... interchangeably); United States v. 52 Drums Maple. Syrup , 110 F.2d 914, 915 (2d Cir. 1940) ......
  • United States v. TWO BAGS, ETC., 9852.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit)
    • January 31, 1945
    ......United States v. 52 Drums Maple Syrup, 110 F.2d 914. See also Union Dairy Co. ......
  • United States v. Bodine Produce Co., C-15992.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. District of Arizona
    • May 24, 1962
    ......United States v. 52" Drums Maple Syrup, 2 Cir., 1940, 110 F.2d 914, 915. .   \xC2"......
  • Continental Seafoods, Inc. v. Schweiker, 80-2462
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • March 19, 1982
    ......No. 80-2462. United States Court of Appeals,. District of Columbia ... See United States v. 52 Drums of Maple Syrup, 110 F.2d 914, 915 (2d Cir. ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT