U.S. v. Coscarelli
| Decision Date | 02 April 1997 |
| Docket Number | No. 96-20264,96-20264 |
| Citation | 111 F.3d 376 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Craig Michael COSCARELLI, also known as John Coscarelli, Defendant-Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Jeffery Alan Babcock, Paula Camille Offenhauser, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Houston, TX, Richard A. Friedman, U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Appellate Section, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Ray Christopher Goldsmith, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas; Vanessa D. Gilmore, Judge.
(Opinion February 3, 1997, 5 Cir., 1997, 105 F.3d 984)
Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and KING, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHE, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
A majority of judges in active service having determined, on the Court's own motion, to rehear this case en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc without argument. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Heard v. Sheahan
... ... 1998); Hertel v. Sullivan, 633 N.E.2d 36, 40 (Ill. App. 1994), which might spell trouble for our plaintiff. But the usual and it seems to us the correct characterization of the doctrine of continuing violation is that it is a doctrine governing accrual, e.g., Wilson v. Giesen, supra, 956 ... ...
- Cox v. Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs of Franklin Cnty.
-
U.S. v. Emerson
... ... Wilson, 98 F.3d at 283; see also United States v. Coscarelli, 105 F.3d 984, 989 (5th Cir.), reh'g en banc granted, 111 F.3d 376 (5th Cir.1997). 1 ... Page 565 ... The Government argues that ... This factor brings Emerson's case clearly within the realm of Wilson, and therefore requires us to remand the case for resentencing ... C. Restitution and Forfeiture ... Emerson finally complains that the district court ... ...
- Interamericas Investments, Ltd. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System