Corn v. Board of Liquor Control
Decision Date | 10 June 1953 |
Docket Number | Nos. 33222,33223,s. 33222 |
Parties | , 50 O.O. 479 CORN v. BOARD OF LIQUOR CONTROL et al. (two cases). |
Court | Ohio Supreme Court |
Isadore Topper, Columbus, for appellant.
C. William O'Neill, Atty.Gen., Robert E. Leach, Columbus, and Ralph N. Mahaffey, Ashville, for appellees.
Two questions are presented to us.
The first question is whether the Court of Appeals erred in overruling Corn's motions to dismiss the appeals of the board, its members, the department, and the director from the judgments of the Court of Common Pleas.
The second question is whether the Court of Appeals erred in reversing the judgments of the Court of Common Pleas on the merits of the controversies before it.
In view of the conclusion at which we have arrived, we do not reach the second question.
Corn contends that the Administrative Procedure Act, sections 154-61 to 154-74, inclusive, General Code, which governs the procedure in the present causes, does not confer a right of appeal upon the board, the department, or the director for a review of a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas reversing an order of the board, and that under such act the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas is final unless reversed upon appeal by the licensee or permitholder.
It is the general law of the land and is settled as the law of this state that, although one has an inherent and inalienable right to a fair and impartial hearing or trial with reference to any infringement of his natural, statutory, or constitutional rights, the right of appeal from the result of such trial is not an inherent or inalienable right but must be conferred by constitution or statute. City of Middletown v. City Commission of Middletown, 138 Ohio St. 596, 37 N.E.2d 609; Lindblom v. Board of Tax Appeals, 151 Ohio St. 250, 85 N.E.2d 376.
Since the Constitution of Ohio gives no right of appeal in causes such as the present ones, we must consider the pertinent parts of the Administrative Procedure Act, which are:
Section 154-62, General Code. "The following words when used in this act shall have the meanings respectively ascribed to them in this section:
Section 154-73. "Any party adversely affected by any order of an agency issued pursuant to an adjudication denying an applicant admission to an examination or denying the issuance or renewal of a license, registration of a licensee, or revoking or suspending a license, may appeal to the common pleas court of the county in which the place of business of the licensee is located or the county in which the licensee is a resident from the order of said agency, provided, however, that appeals from decisions of the board of liquor control shall be to the court of common pleas of Franklin county only. If any such party is not a resident of and has no place of business in Ohio he may appeal to the common pleas court of Franklin county.
The procedure in the present causes is governed by the above sections, which were in effect prior to the amendment of section 154-73, effective August 28, 1951, 124 Ohio Laws 262.
In construing those sections, it is pertinent to refer to the case of State, ex rel. Zugravu v. O'Brien, 130 Ohio St. 23, 196 N.E. 664, which was decided at a time when, under the statutes, the action of the Board of Liquor Control was final and there was no right of appeal therefrom to a court. The action was one in mandamus seeking to compel the Board of Liquor Control to reverse a revocation of certain liquor permits and to require the reinstating thereof. It...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hamilton County Bd. of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities v. Professionals Guild of Ohio
...of Review disaffirming the director's layoff order of an employee for alleged lack of work. (R.C. 119.01 and 119.12.) (Corn v. Bd. of Liquor Control [1953], 160 Ohio St. 9 * * * [50 O.O. 479, 113 N.E.2d 360].)" Id. at paragraph three of the syllabus. Our decision in Osborn, supra, addresses......
-
Thompson v. Hayes, 2006 Ohio 6000 (Ohio App. 11/14/2006)
...adverse to it when the judgment is rendered upon an appeal from a decision of that agency. See, e.g., Corn v. Bd. of Liquor Control (1953), 160 Ohio St. 9, 17, 50 O.O. 479, 113 N.E.2d 360. The present appeal, however, does not involve an order or decision of {¶32} The Seventh Appellate Dist......
-
State ex rel. Broadway Petroleum Corp. v. City of Elyria
...Compensation Commission has no authority to appeal from a court decision reversing the board's order); Corn v. Board of Liquor Control (1953), 160 Ohio St. 9, 113 N.E.2d 360 (Board of Liquor Control has no standing to appeal from a decision of the Court of Common Pleas reversing the board's......
-
Colonial Village v. Bd. of Rev.
...to vacate its decision on the grounds that the appellate court did not have jurisdiction, relying on Corn v. Bd. of Liquor Control (1953), 160 Ohio St. 9, 50 O.O. 479, 113 N.E.2d 360. The court of appeals vacated its judgment, and on appeal to this court, we concluded: "The Board of Liquor ......