Hoefle v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Citation | 114 F.2d 713 |
Decision Date | 16 September 1940 |
Docket Number | No. 8232.,8232. |
Parties | HOEFLE v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. |
Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit) |
Clement V. Jacobs, of Dayton, Ohio, for petitioner.
Harry Marselli, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen. (Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sewall Key and Harry Marselli, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., on the brief), for respondent.
Before ALLEN, HAMILTON, and ARANT, Circuit Judges.
The Commissioner of Internal Revenue asserted a deficiency in petitioner's income tax for the year 1931, and also assessed penalties for late filing and for failure, with intent to defraud the United States, fully to report income. The Board of Tax Appeals sustained the Commissioner in his holding that certain unidentified deposits constituted income, his denial of certain deductions claimed for bad debts, and his assessments of penalties.
For some time prior to 1931, petitioner was in the employ of W. C. Rands, Inc., a company engaged in the investment brokerage business in Detroit, Michigan. He first served as secretary to the president and later handled purchases and sales of securities. His salary was $400 a month. He began in 1926 buying and selling securities in a small way for himself, and his market activities gradually expanded. In 1931 he sold 48,500 shares of stock in one hundred and twenty-four separate transactions, using four accounts, each under a code number, with three brokerage houses. The stock, which had cost him $4,045,562.50, brought $4,216,311.50. After deduction of short dividends and premiums in the amount of $18,093.66 and a loss of $725.74, a net profit of $151,929.60 remained. There were other items of income, including salary, interest on savings, and fees from an estate.
Petitioner did not file his return until November 5, 1933, a year and seven months after it was due, and after he had seen a newspaper report, which he confirmed by inquiry of his brokers, that the Bureau of Internal Revenue was investigating brokers' accounts.
The only question here is whether the Board's findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence. If they are, we can not reverse, even if, on the basis of the record, we think we would find differently. Palmer v. Commissioner, 302 U.S. 63, 58 S. Ct. 67, 82 L.Ed. 50; Helvering v. F. R. Lazarus & Co., 308 U.S. 252, 60 S.Ct. 209, 84 L.Ed. 226; Marshall v. Commissioner, 6 Cir., 57 F.2d 633, certiorari denied, 287 U. S. 621, 53 S.Ct. 20, 77 L.Ed. 539.
Properly taking the position that the Commissioner's determination that certain unidentified deposits constituted income was prima facie correct and the burden upon the taxpayer to overcome this presumption, the Board said:
There was no reversible error in this finding of the Board.
The Board also upheld the Commissioner's denial of deductions for bad debts, neither of which had been claimed in petitioner's return. As to the first alleged loan, petitioner testified as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Harper v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue
...132 F.2d 775, 776 (C.A. 2, 1943), certiorari denied 318 U.S. 787; Thomas B. Jones, 29 T.C. 601, 613-614 (1957); Hoefle v. Commissioner, 114 F.2d 713, 714 (C.A. 6, 1940); Boyett v. Commissioner, 204 F.2d 205, 208 (C.A. 5, 1953); Goe v. Commissioner, 198 F.2d 851, 853 (C.A. 3, 1952); Doll v. ......
-
Gaines v. Commissioner
...(4th Cir. 1959), affg. Dec. 22,434 28 T.C. 698 (1957), cert. denied 361 U.S. 862 (1959); Hoefle v. Commissioner 40-2 USTC ¶ 9673, 114 F. 2d 713 (6th Cir. 1940), affg. a Memorandum Opinion of the Board of Tax Appeals. To meet this burden, Lewis must identify and explain the deposits sufficie......
-
Harris v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue (In re Estate of Mason)
...494 (5th Cir. 1967), revg. on other grounds a Memorandum Opinion of this Court; Hague Estate v. Commissioner, supra; Hoefle v. Commissioner, 114 F.2d 713 (6th Cir. 1940), affg. a Memorandum Opinion of this Court; Jesse Ullman Reaves, 31 T.C. 690 (1958), affd. 295 F.2d 336 (5th Cir. 1961); H......
-
Hoffman v. Commissioner
...was prima facie correct and the burden was upon the taxpayers in the Tax Court to overcome this presumption. See Hoefle v. Commissioner, 114 F. 2d 713 40-2 USTC ¶ In Valetti v. Commissioner (C. A. 3), 260 F. 2d 185 58-2 USTC ¶ 9869, affd. in part 28 T. C. 692 Dec. 22,433, the Court of Appea......