Eastern Elec. Const. Co. v. Morrissey

Citation142 Conn. 742,115 A.2d 427
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
Decision Date27 June 1955
PartiesThe EASTERN ELECTRIC CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. Thomas F. MORRISSEY. Supreme Court of Errors of Connecticut

Gregory C. Willis, Bridgeport, for appellant (plaintiff).

No appearance for defendant (appellee).

Before BALDWIN, O'SULLIVAN, WYNNE and DALY, JJ., and PHILLIPS, Superior Court Judge.

PER CURIAM.

On September 29, 1952, the defendant entered into a contract of employment with the plaintiff which provided that, for one year after the termination of his employment for any cause, he would not directly or indirectly, within the city of Bridgeport or within a radius of twenty miles therefrom, engage in, or be employed by, any business in competition with the plaintiff. The plaintiff discharged the defendant for good cause on October 9, 1953. When this action was brought in November, 1953, and when the plaintiff's application for an injunction was denied by the court on February 23, 1954, the defendant was in the employ of the County Electric Company, Inc., of Bridgeport, a competitor of the plaintiff. The plaintiff has appealed. It claims errors in the finding and in the conclusions of the court. While its claims appear to have merit, they present purely academic questions. The period of one year after the termination of the defendant's employment with the plaintiff has long since passed. 'It is a well-settled general rule that the existence of an actual controversy is an essential requisite to appellate jurisdiction; it is not the province of appellate courts to decide moot questions, disconnected from the granting of actual relief or from the determination of which no practical relief can follow.' Reynolds v. Vroom, 130 Conn. 512, 515, 36 A.2d 22, 24; State ex rel. Foote v. Bartholomew, 106 Conn. 698, 701, 138 A. 787; see Reply of the Judges, 33 Conn. 586; 5 C.J.S., Appeal and Error, § 1455, p. 36. The plaintiff states that it has identical contracts with other employees and that a determination of this case will furnish guidance with respect to these contracts. No controversy, however, has yet arisen concerning them, and the parties to them are not parties to this litigation. The case of H. O. Canfield Co. v. United Construction Workers, 136 Conn. 293, 70 A.2d 547, is distinguishable on its facts.

The appeal is dismissed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Nowell v. Nowell
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Connecticut
    • January 28, 1969
    ...have become academic. Congress & Daggett, Inc. v. Seamless Rubber Co., 145 Conn. 318, 323, 142 A.2d 137; Eastern Electric Construction Co. v. Morrissey, 142 Conn. 742, 743, 115 A.2d 427. IV The court did not commit error by denying the defendant's motion for permission to file a counterclai......
  • Lambrakos v. Carson
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Connecticut
    • March 21, 1978
    ...appeal to which Soula is a party. See, E. g., Harkins v. Driscoll, supra, 165 Conn. 409, 334 A.2d 901; Eastern Electric Construction Co. v. Morrissey, 142 Conn. 742, 743, 115 A.2d 427. There is error, the judgment is set aside and the case is remanded with direction to overrule the defendan......
  • Triangle Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. Silver
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Connecticut
    • July 26, 1966
    ...as this case is presented, to consider the defendants' attack on the scope of the injunction. 2 Eastern Electric Construction Co. v. Morrissey, 142 Conn. 742, 743, 115 A.2d 427. There remains for consideration the correctness of the court's action in awarding punitive or exemplary damages i......
  • Harkins v. Driscoll
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Connecticut
    • November 13, 1973
    ...the police department and, even if a controversy does exist, that member is not a party to this action. Eastern Electric Construction Co. v. Morrissey, 142 Conn. 742, 743, 115 A.2d 427. Courts exist for determination of actual and existing controversies, and under the law of this state the ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT