Com. of Va. v. E.P.A.
| Decision Date | 10 June 1997 |
| Docket Number | Nos. 95-1163,95-1177 and 95-1180,s. 95-1163 |
| Citation | 116 F.3d 499 |
| Parties | , 325 U.S.App.D.C. 155, 27 Envtl. L. Rep. 21,380 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, et al., Petitioners, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent. State of Connecticut, et al., Intervenors. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit |
Before WILLIAMS, RANDOLPH, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.
O R D E R
Upon consideration of respondent's petition for partial rehearing as to remedy, filed April 25, 1997, and the responses thereto, it is
ORDERED that the petition be granted for the reasons set forth in the attached opinion of the Court.
In Commonwealth of Virginia v. EPA, 108 F.3d 1397 (D.C.Cir.1997), we vacated EPA's final rule (60 Fed.Reg. 4712 (1995)) imposing vehicle emission standards on the northeastern states on the grounds that the rule violated sections 177 and 202 of the Clean Air Act ("the Act"), 42 U.S.C. §§ 7507 & 7521. EPA now asks us to reconsider our decision insofar as it struck down the final rule in its entirety. A portion of the rule, the agency claims, should be reinstated--the portion, that is, dealing with the determination of model years of vehicles for states voluntarily choosing to adopt restrictive vehicle emission standards pursuant to section 177 of the Act.
The primary subject of the final rule, and the only aspect of the rule addressed in our decision, was EPA's requirement (codified at 40 C.F.R. Pts. 51 and 52) that states cure the inadequacy in their state implementation plans by submitting revisions adopting the Ozone Transport Commission Low Emission Vehicle program. The final rule contained another provision not mentioned in any of the briefs and which, accordingly, our earlier opinion did not address: the "Determination of Model Year" section, codified at 40 C.F.R. Pt. 85. EPA argues that the Part 85 model-year provisions are completely severable from the remainder of EPA's final rule, and have importance beyond the particular Low Emission Vehicle program at issue in our earlier opinion.
One of the petitioners, the Commonwealth of Virginia, does not oppose EPA's request. The other petitioners, who are associations of automobile manufacturers and dealers, object despite their agreement that "the model year rulemaking constituted a distinct and minor portion of the overall rulemaking docket." Response of Petitioners AAMA, AIAM and NADA to EPA's Petition for Partial Rehearing at 2 (May 15, 1997). Their point is that the model-year provisions are offensive for reasons they gave in comments against EPA's proposed rule. Since these petitioners did not seek judicial review of the final model-year provisions on the grounds they now advance, we cannot consider their arguments. Cf. Rollins Envtl. Servs., Inc. v. EPA, 937 F.2d 649, 652-53 n. 2 (D.C.Cir.1991).
We agree with EPA that reinstating Part 85 of the final rule will not affect the substance of our ruling in this case. The model-year provisions correct what have been, because of the absence of EPA regulations, differing judicial interpretations of ...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Appalachian Power Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency
...federalism bar." 213 F.3d at 687. We referred there to our holding in Virginia v. EPA, 108 F.3d 1397, 1408, modified on other grounds, 116 F.3d 499 (1997), that under 110 each state retains the power, in its SIP, to determine how it will achieve the NAAQS, and that the EPA may not dictate t......
-
Carlson v. Postal Regulatory Comm'n, 18-1328
...of the rule. See, e.g. , K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc. , 486 U.S. 281, 294, 108 S.Ct. 1811, 100 L.Ed.2d 313 (1988) ; Virginia v. EPA , 116 F.3d 499, 500–01 (D.C. Cir. 1997). Two conditions limit the exercise of this power. First, the court must find that "the agency would have adopted the s......
-
Am. Petroleum Inst. v. Envtl. Prot. Agency
...course reconsider as necessary. See MD/DC/DE Broadcasters Ass'n v. FCC , 253 F.3d 732, 740 (D.C. Cir. 2001) (citing Virginia v. EPA , 116 F.3d 499, 500–01 (D.C. Cir. 1997) ).Having concluded that the Verified Recycler Exclusion is unreasonable, we need not address Environmental Petitioners'......
-
Natural Res. Def. Council v. Wheeler
...732 (D.C. Cir. 2001) ; Davis Cty. Solid Waste Mgmt. v. EPA , 108 F.3d 1454, 1455 (D.C. Cir. 1997) (per curiam); Virginia v. EPA , 116 F.3d 499 (D.C. Cir. 1997) (per curiam). But EPA did not do so.The upshot is that, after Mexichem , the 2015 Rule’s HFC listings remained applicable to the cl......
-
EPA's Fine Particulate Air Pollution Control Program
...4575-76 (2004). 183. 42 U.S.C. §7410(a)(2)(D). 184. See Virginia v. EPA, 108 F.3d 1397, 1406, 27 ELR 20718 (D.C. Cir. 1997), modiied , 116 F.3d 499, 27 ELR 21380 (1998); Train v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 421 U.S. 60, 79, 5 ELR 20264 (1975). 185. See Air Pollution Control Dist. of Je......
-
Interstate Air Pollution Control Using Economic-Based Air Pollution Controls
...138. 42 U.S.C. §7410(a)(2)(D), CAA §110(a)(2)(D). 139. See Virginia v. EPA, 108 F.3d 1397, 1406, 27 ELR 20718 (D.C. Cir. 1997), modiied , 116 F.3d 499, 27 ELR 21380 (D.C. Cir. 1997); Train v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 421 U.S. 60, 79, 5 ELR 20264 (1975). 140. New York v. EPA, 852 F......
-
Mobile Source Air Pollution Control
...Battle Against Massachusetts ZEV Mandates , 7 Clean Air Rep. (Inside EPA) 9 (Dec. 26, 1996). 540. 108 F.3d 1397, 27 ELR 20718, modiied , 116 F.3d 499, 27 ELR 21380. 531. Regulators Would Opt for 49-State Plan Over Zev Mandate, OTC Draft Letter Says , Daily Env’t Rep. (BNA), July 11, 1995 at......
-
State and federal command-and-control regulation of emissions from fossil-fuel electric power generating plants.
...significant deterioration of air quality or to protect visibility. Id. (366) Virginia v. EPA, 108 F.3d 1397 (D.C. Cir. 1997), modified by 116 F.3d 499 (1998); Train v. Natural Res. Def. Council, 421 U.S. 60, 79 (367) 42 U.S.C. [section] 7410(k)(5) (2000). (368) New York v. EPA, 852 F.2d 574......