Otis v. Oregon Steam 8212 Ship Co
Citation | 6 S.Ct. 523,116 U.S. 548,29 L.Ed. 719 |
Parties | OTIS v. OREGON STEAM—SHIP CO. Filed |
Decision Date | 01 February 1886 |
Court | United States Supreme Court |
Geo. H. Adams, for the motion.
John Sessions and John R. Abney, against the motion.
This is a suit brought December 12, 1878, by the Oregon Steam-ship Company, the defendant in error, against George K Otis, the plaintiff in error. The complaint alleges that on the second of March, 1874, Otis, as agent of the steam-ship company, entered into 'a certain steam-boat contract' with the United States for carying the mails between San Francisco, California, and Portland, Oregon, from June 1, 1874, to June 30, 1878, at the rate of twenty-five thousand dollars per annum; that the steam-ship company performed the contract, and that Otis received $97,131.38 on account of the service, which was the full amount due after certain deductions provided for in the contract were made; that of this amount he paid the company $83,675.24, and is entitled to retain $2,500 as his agreed compensation, but that he neglects and refuses to pay over the balance, being $13,456.25, and for this judgment is asked. Otis in his answer admits the making of the contract as set forth in the complaint, but denies that he made it as agent for the steam-ship company. He also admits that he has received the amount of money which is stated, and that he has not paid over the balance claimed to be due. The case was tried by a referee, who found that the contract was made by Otis as agent for the company; that the company had performed the service; that Otis had received the money as charged; and that there was due from him the amount claimed. Upon the filing of the report Otis excepted to the findings in these words:
Neither in the pleadings, nor in the evidence, nor in the findings, nor in the exceptions as shown by the record, was there any title, right, privilege, or immunity specially set up or claimed under the constitution or a law or authority of the United States. The sole issue in the case was as to the agency of Otis. The steam-ship company alleged that he made the contract as its agent,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Corngold v. United States
...... of a person who was passing back and forth between a ship and shore after both the ship and the person had already ......
-
Dawson Farmers Elevator Company, a Corp. v. Fred Opp
...... called to it. Oregon S.S. Co. v. Otis, 100 N.Y. 446,. 53 Am. Rep. 221, 3 N.E. ......
-
Dawson Farmers' Elevator Co. v. Opp
...witness should have been called to it. Oregon S. S. Co. v. Otis, 100 N. Y. 446, 3 N. E. 485, 53 Am. Rep. 221;Otis v. Oregon S. S. Co., 116 U. S. 548, 6 S. Ct. 523, 29 L. Ed. 719. The cases are collected and cited in 19 Ann. Cas. 651, and in 25 A. L. R. 9. It is well settled the presumption ......