State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Decision Date19 December 2002
Docket NumberNo. 1859–01.,1859–01.
Citation119 T.C. No. 21,119 T.C. 342
PartiesSTATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY and Subsidiaries, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
CourtU.S. Tax Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Taxpayer, an affiliated group of life and nonlife insurance companies petitioned for redetermination of deficiencies arising from disallowance of taxpayer's method of determining its alternative minimum tax (AMT) liability. The Tax Court, Cohen, J., held that AMT book income adjustment was to be made using a consolidated approach, with a single adjustment for the entire group.

Decision for taxpayer. Jerome B. Libin, James V. Heffernan, and Mary E. Monahan, for petitioner.

Jan E. Lamartine, for respondent.

OPINION

COHEN, J.

P is an affiliated group of corporations filing a consolidated Federal income tax return. The group comprises both life and nonlife insurance companies, referred to as the life subgroup and the nonlife subgroup, respectively. P became subject to the alternative minimum tax (AMT) for 1987 as a result of events in 1989 generating a nonlife subgroup net operating loss carryback from 1989 to 1987. For purposes of determining its AMT liability, P calculated the book income adjustment on a consolidated basis. R maintains that the book income adjustment is to be made on a subgroup basis, with a separate adjustment for each subgroup.

Held: In the context of a life-nonlife consolidated return, the AMT book income adjustment is to be made using a consolidated approach, with a single adjustment for the entire group.

Respondent determined a Federal income tax deficiency in the amount of $1,235,690 with respect to the 1987 taxable year of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. and Subsidiaries (herein collectively petitioner). By answer, respondent asserted an increased deficiency of $2,827,110. The principal issue for decision is the computation of petitioner's alternative minimum tax (AMT) liability for 1987, which in turn will involve consideration of the amount of petitioner's alternative tax net operating loss (ATNOL) carryback from 1989. Integral to each of these calculations is the question of how properly, in the context of the consolidated return of an affiliated group of life and nonlife insurance companies, to take into account the alternative minimum tax book income adjustment of section 56(f).

Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for relevant years, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

Background

All of the facts have been stipulated. The stipulated facts are incorporated as our findings by this reference.

Petitioner's Organization and Operations

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. (State Farm) is a mutual insurance company taxed as a corporation, the principal office of which at all relevant times was located in Bloomington, Illinois. State Farm is engaged in the business of providing property and casualty insurance. State Farm is also the common parent of an affiliated group including domestic life insurance companies taxed under section 801, domestic nonlife insurance companies, and other domestic corporations. Pursuant to an election under section 1504(c), the affiliated group filed consolidated Federal income tax returns for 1984 and for subsequent years, including 1986 through 1990.

Petitioner's Accounting

For financial accounting purposes, State Farm files an annual statement with State insurance regulators on the form prescribed by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC). This statement includes only the net book income of the parent company. Separate NAIC annual statements are required to be filed for each insurance company in the affiliated group in every State in which that company is licensed to do business. Companies in the affiliated group that are not regulated as insurance companies also produce financial statements, which include book income that is not included in the financial statements of other group members.

For 1987, the total net book income attributable to life insurance companies of the affiliated group was $199,969,459 and that attributable to nonlife members was $2,392,675,741. For 1989, the total net book income attributable to life and to nonlife members was $231,216,351 and a loss of $40,044,428, respectively.

Petitioner's 1987 and 1989 Taxable Years

During the 1987 through 1989 period, the affiliated group comprised 2 first-tier life insurance company subsidiaries taxable under section 801 (which, for purposes of section 1503(c) and section 1.1502–47, Income Tax Regs., constituted the “life subgroup”) and 11 other subsidiary corporations (which, for purposes of section 1503(c) and section 1.1502–47, Income Tax Regs., constituted the “nonlife subgroup”).

When petitioner originally filed its 1987 consolidated Federal income tax return, it was not subject to the AMT imposed by section 55. Rather, petitioner ultimately became subject to the AMT for 1987 as a result of occurrences in 1989, namely, Hurricane Hugo, that adversely affected the property/casualty insurance operations of the nonlife subgroup in that year and generated a nonlife subgroup net operating loss (NOL) carryback from 1989 to 1987.

For regular tax purposes, items relevant to petitioner's tax liability, before any NOL deduction, would include the following:

+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                ¦Tax Item                               ¦1987             ¦1989             ¦
                +---------------------------------------+-----------------+-----------------¦
                ¦                                       ¦                 ¦                 ¦
                +---------------------------------------+-----------------+-----------------¦
                ¦Taxable income of nonlife s ubgroup    ¦1  $1,538,315,230¦2  ($691,736,003)¦
                +---------------------------------------+-----------------+-----------------¦
                ¦                                       ¦                 ¦                 ¦
                +---------------------------------------+-----------------+-----------------¦
                ¦Partial taxable income of life subgroup¦3  214,881,622   ¦4  261,624,770   ¦
                +---------------------------------------+-----------------+-----------------¦
                ¦                                       ¦                 ¦                 ¦
                +---------------------------------------+-----------------+-----------------¦
                ¦Amount subtracted under sec. 815       ¦0                ¦0                ¦
                +---------------------------------------+-----------------+-----------------¦
                ¦                                       ¦                 ¦                 ¦
                +---------------------------------------+-----------------+-----------------¦
                ¦                                       ¦                 ¦                 ¦
                +---------------------------------------+-----------------+-----------------¦
                ¦                                       ¦                 ¦                 ¦
                +---------------------------------------+-----------------+-----------------¦
                ¦                                       ¦                 ¦                 ¦
                +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                

FN1. An environmental tax deduction of $2,368,957 is taken into account in the figure stated. The parties agree that the precise amount of the deduction will depend upon the resolution of this case.FN2. An environmental tax deduction of $0 is taken into account in the figure stated.FN3. An environmental tax deduction of $259,030 is taken into account in the figure stated. The parties agree that the precise amount of the deduction will depend upon the resolution of this case.FN4. An environmental tax deduction of $313,560 is taken into account in the figure stated.

Under the regular tax regime, all of the 1989 nonlife subgroup net operating loss of $691,736,003 is required by section 1503(c) to be carried back to 1987 and cannot be used to offset 1989 life subgroup partial taxable income.

For AMT purposes, adjustments and preference items under sections 56, 57, and 58, excluding the book income adjustment and any ATNOL deduction, are as set forth below:

+------------------------------------------------------------+
                ¦AMT Adjustments and Preference Items¦1987       ¦1989       ¦
                +------------------------------------+-----------+-----------¦
                ¦Nonlife subgroup                    ¦$18,508,088¦$70,327,213¦
                +------------------------------------+-----------+-----------¦
                ¦Life subgroup                       ¦915,175    ¦1,361,584  ¦
                +------------------------------------------------------------+
                

The parties have also stipulated that the ATNOL deduction for 1987, the total amount of which remains in dispute, will include ($189,367,790) attributable to a nonlife subgroup NOL carryover from 1986.

Discussion

I. General RulesA. Life–Nonlife Consolidated Returns

Prior to enactment of the Tax Reform Act of 1976 (TRA 1976), Pub.L. 94–455, sec. 1507, 90 Stat. 1739, nonlife insurance companies were prohibited from filing consolidated returns with life insurance companies. See S. Conf. Rept. 94–1236, at 511 (1976), 1976–3 C.B. (Vol.3) 807, 915. The restrictions sought to ensure that life insurance companies, traditionally profitable, paid income tax commensurate with their investment income, undiminished by the losses of often unprofitable property and casualty companies. Nichols v. United States, 260 F.3d 637, 642 (6th Cir.2001); Conn. Gen. Life Ins. Co. v. Commissioner, 177 F.3d 136, 138 (3d Cir.1999), affg. 109 T.C. 100, 1997 WL 458282 (1997). Economic considerations, however, led Congress to permit consolidation for years beginning after 1980 in order to “provide [ ] substantial relief in the future for casualty companies with losses.” S. Rept. 94–938 (Part 1), at 454–455 (1976), 1976–3 C.B. (Vol.3) 49, 492–493; see also TRA 1976 sec. 1507(c), 90 Stat. 1740. At the same time, certain limitations were enacted to “preserve[ ] the concept sought by Congress in...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Francisco v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 7670–00.
    • United States
    • U.S. Tax Court
    • December 19, 2002
    ... ... source income; and (3) State income tax refunds were includable in gross ... ...
  • State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.  v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 5426–05.
    • United States
    • U.S. Tax Court
    • June 23, 2008
    ...file consolidated returns if an appropriate election is made under section 1504(c). See State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Commissioner, 119 T.C. 342, 345–346, 2002 WL 31844677 (2002) (State Farm I), affd. 105 Fed. Appx. 67 (7th Cir.2004), for a more detailed background on life-nonlife conso......
  • State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 1859–01.
    • United States
    • U.S. Tax Court
    • January 17, 2006
    ...On December 19, 2002, this Court held that petitioner had made such an overpayment for 1987. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Commissioner, 119 T.C. 342, 2002 WL 31844677 (2002), affd. 105 Fed. Appx. 67 (7th Cir.2004). The Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed this Court's deci......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT