12 Havemeyer Place Co., LLC v. Gordon
Decision Date | 17 January 2006 |
Docket Number | No. 25864.,25864. |
Citation | 93 Conn.App. 140,888 A.2d 141 |
Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
Parties | 12 HAVEMEYER PLACE COMPANY, LLC v. Allan S. GORDON. |
Eric D. Grayson, Greenwich, for the appellant (plaintiff).
David W. Rubin, Stamford, for the appellee (defendant).
DRANGINIS, FLYNN and McLACHLAN, Js.
This appeal concerns a mundane matter of increasing importance in today's urban society, parking spaces. The determinative issue on appeal is whether the claims for declaratory relief, equitable reformation of a lease, injunctive relief and breach of the lease are barred by the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel pursuant to 12 Havemeyer Place Co., LLC v. Gordon, 76 Conn.App. 377, 820 A.2d 299, cert. denied, 264 Conn. 919, 828 A.2d 618 (2003) (Havemeyer I), a summary process action. On appeal, the plaintiff, 12 Havemeyer Place Company, LLC, has raised numerous claims related to the judgment rendered by the trial court after the granting of the motion for summary judgment filed by the defendant, Allan S. Gordon.1 Because the legality of the lease at issue was adjudicated in Havemeyer I, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The parties agree as to the historical facts giving rise to their ongoing dispute, which were set out in Havemeyer I.2 The "dispute relates to the parties' interests in sixteen parking spaces located in an underground parking garage, which currently is owned by the plaintiff. . . ." Id., at 379, 820 A.2d 299. "The defendant leases the sixteen parking spaces from the plaintiff for the benefit of a building owned by the defendant at 71 Arch Street [in Greenwich]. . . . In 1980, John Jay Ginter Development and Construction, Inc., the then owner of both 60 Arch Street and 71 Arch Street, filed a site plan for 60 Arch Street with the town of Greenwich planning and zoning commission (commission). The commission approved the site plan, which showed a three story office retail building with a total of fifty-eight parking spaces. The preliminary site plan application, dated November 12, 1980, designated forty-eight of the spaces for 60 Arch Street and ten for 71 Arch Street. This designation, however, was deleted from the application for final site plan approval, dated December 8, 1980, which merely proposed fifty-eight spaces without any reference to 71 Arch Street. In a subsequent site plan, dated December 10, 1980, the designation of forty-eight spaces required for 60 Arch Street and the ten spaces for 71 Arch Street reappeared.
12 Havemeyer Place Co., LLC v. Gordon, supra, 76 Conn.App. at 380-83, 820 A.2d 299.
The plaintiff appealed to this court. The precise question addressed in Havemeyer I was "whether a lessor, on the ground of illegality, may gain possession of leased premises from a lessee solely on the ground that the recorded lease varied the requirements of a site plan, when the lessee has not breached any covenant of the lease and the town has not cited the lessee for a violation or ordered the lessee to take any corrective action." Id., at 383, 820 A.2d 299. This court held that given the particular facts of the case, the plaintiff was not entitled to possession because the "violation of the zoning laws with regard to the parking required by the site plan was not sufficient to render the lease illegal as against public policy." Id., at 392, 820 A.2d 299.
On April 15, 2004, the plaintiff caused the present action to be served on the defendant. The verified complaint alleged facts consistent with the preceding history, as well as that the town's zoning enforcement officer had issued notice of a violation against the defendant and 71 Arch Street on the basis of the lease and the use of the six parking spaces at 60 Arch Street. Furthermore, the plaintiff alleged that paragraph five of the lease requires the defendant to comply with "all statutes, ordinances, rules, orders, regulations and requirements of the federal, state and city government and of any and all other departments and bureaus applicable to the [p]arking [s]paces." In addition, the plaintiff alleged that the defendant must vacate the six parking spaces to restore the approved conditions of the site plan.
The verified complaint also alleged that on April 2, 2004, the plaintiff gave written notice to the defendant that he must comply with the town's notice of violation and vacate the parking spaces so that the use of the building will comply with the site plan.3 The plaintiff also informed the defendant that if he did not vacate the parking spaces voluntarily, the plaintiff would commence the present action to evict him from the parking spaces or invoke equity to reform the lease. The plaintiff also alleged that the defendant, through counsel, had informed it that the defendant would not vacate the parking spaces voluntarily or comply with the order from the zoning enforcement officer.
The complaint further alleged that the plaintiff was unable to obtain a zoning variance because the issue concerning the parking spaces was self-created and that the commission cannot vary its regulations with respect to the parking spaces at 60 Arch Street. In count one of the verified complaint, the plaintiff alleged that bona fide and substantial questions exist as to the legality of the lease and whether the defendant must vacate six of the parking spaces to comply with the town's zoning order. The plaintiff prayed that the court declare the lease illegal as to six parking spaces.
Count two of the verified...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Pollack v. Eitelberg
... ... United Oil Co. v. Urban Development Commission, 158 ... Conn. 364, ... place in August 2012, and admits that he has not yet ... Docket No. CV 98 0486346 (July 12, 2002, Berger, J.), ... aff'd, 76 Conn.App. 907, 822 ... Havermeyer Place Co. v. Gordon, 93 Conn.App. 140, ... 157-58, 888 A.2s 141 (2006) ... ...
-
Tuccio Development, Inc. v. Neumann
...A.2d 506 (1992); Chadha v. Charlotte Hungerford Hospital, 97 Conn.App. 527, 539, 906 A.2d 14 (2006); 12 Havemeyer Place Co., LLC v. Gordon, 93 Conn.App. 140, 156-58, 888 A.2d 141 (2006). It is true that as a general matter, summary judgment is considered inappropriate when an individual's i......
-
Midland Funding, LLC v. Mitchell-James, 37697.
...affirmatively that the affiant is competent to testify to the matters stated therein....” See, e.g., 12 Havemeyer Place Co., LLC v. Gordon, 93 Conn.App. 140, 157, 888 A.2d 141 (2006) (explaining that “affidavit [that] does not contain admissible evidence as required by our rules of practice......
-
Double G.G. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's
...omitted.) United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment Commission, 158 Conn. 364, 377, 260 A.2d 596 (1969). In 12 Havemeyer Place Co., LLC v. Gordon, 93 Conn.App. 140, 888 A.2d 141 (2006), a case involving the legality and enforceability of a lease, this court held that, in determining whether sum......