Gulf, C. & S. F. R. Co. v. Hurley

Decision Date22 October 1889
Citation12 S.W. 226
PartiesGULF, C. & S. F. R. CO. <I>v.</I> HURLEY.
CourtTexas Supreme Court

Appeal from district court, Tarrant county; R. E. BECKHAM, Judge.

Action by W. B. Hurley against the Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railroad Company for damages. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant appeals.

Leake, Shepard & Miller, for appellant.

HENRY, J.

Appellee, who was plaintiff in the court below, alleged that he purchased from the local agent of defendant at Fort Worth, Tex., a ticket over its railroad from Fort Worth to Morgan, and was by such agent directed to board one of the defendant's freight trains, and was assured by him that passengers were carried on such train, and that in pursuance of these instructions plaintiff, at defendant's regular depot, boarded said train as a passenger to said town of Morgan. He charges that at a point one and a half miles from Fort Worth, and before reaching Morgan, the servants of defendant in charge of said train unlawfully and forcibly expelled him from the train, at a place not a station, and in the night-time, and left him to find his way back to Fort Worth as best he could, and that he, being a stranger, experienced great fatigue and distress in finding his way back, and by reason thereof and the ejection from the train he suffered great pain of mind and body, to his damage $2,000. That he lost the money paid for the ticket, and was compelled to lie over at Fort Worth, and was hindered from attending to his regular business, to his further damage $100. The defendant, by his own testimony, proved that he was at Fort Worth, and his family was at Stephensville, to which place he was on his way pursuant to a call from his wife, informing him that his baby was dangerously sick. He testified that, finding that the delay in waiting for a passenger train would cause him to miss connections, he applied to the ticket agent at the Union depot at Fort Worth, and explained to him his anxiety to speedily get home, and the cause of it, whereupon the ticket agent assured him he could take passage on a freight train that would arrive at a certain hour, and that was expected to make the desired connections, and with that view sold him a ticket; that he accordingly, by direction of the agent selling the ticket, took passage on one of defendant's freight trains, from which he was shortly afterwards expelled in the manner charged in his petition, by the servants of defendant, for the reason that the train that he was aboard did not carry passengers. He charges that he informed the agents of de...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Jennings v. The St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • November 15, 1892
    ...2 of its own motion. O'Leary v. Rowan, 31 Mo. 119; Barrett v. Tel. Co., 42 Mo.App. 549; State to use v. Blackman, 51 Mo. 319; Railroad v. Hurley, 12 S.W. 226. (4) The court in refusing instructions numbers 4 and 5 asked by defendant. (5) The court erred in modifying defendant's refused inst......
  • Gurley v. The Missouri Pacific Railway Company
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • May 24, 1894
    ...v. Tuttle, 1 Allen, 186; Field v. Railroad, 76 Mo. 614; County v. Railroad, 22 S.W. 572; Mellwitz v. Railroad, 62 Hun, 622; Railroad v. Hurley, 12 S.W. 226; O'Leary v. Rowan, 31 Mo. 119; State Blackwell, 51 Mo. 319; Morgan v. Durfee, 69 Mo. 479. (2) The court erred in overruling the demurre......
  • Beath v. Rapid R. Co.
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • March 14, 1899
    ... ... party, but from the natural and uniform effects of the injury ... itself." In Railway Co. v. Hurley, 74 Tex. 593, ... 12 S.W. 226, it was held that where the plaintiff had been ... ejected from a train, in the nighttime, at some distance from ... ...
  • Triolo v. Foster
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • May 16, 1900
    ...and every fact beyond that proper to be considered and estimated by the jury must be alleged, or it cannot be proved." Railway Co. v. Hurley, 74 Tex. 595, 12 S. W. 226. The fourth assignment complains of the charge on exemplary damages (above quoted) as assuming the existence of the fact th......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT