Marcroft v. Carvel Corp.

Decision Date19 May 1986
Citation120 A.D.2d 651,502 N.Y.S.2d 245
PartiesMargaret E. MARCROFT, et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. CARVEL CORPORATION, et al., Defendants third-party Plaintiffs-Appellants; Kenneth Kirschbaum, et al., third-party Defendants-Respondents, et al., third-party Defendants.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

McCormick Dunne & Foley, New York City (Joseph P. Altman, Jr., and Robin Mary Heaney of counsel), for defendants third-party plaintiffs-appellants.

Pascarella, Illmensee & Carra, Garden City (James A. Pascarella and Lawrence V. Carra of counsel), for plaintiffs-respondents.

Mulholland, Minion & Roe, Williston Park (George Dieter of counsel), for third-party defendant-respondent Kenneth Kirschbaum.

Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, New York City (Marvin V. Ausubel, Rafael Ventura-Rosa and John A. Borek of counsel), for third-party defendant-respondent Chrysler Corp.

Before BROWN, J.P., and WEINSTEIN, NEIHOFF and SPATT, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roberto, J.), dated January 7, 1985, which (1) granted the motions of the third-party defendants Kirschbaum and Chrysler Corporation to dismiss the third-party complaint, and (2) denied their cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs' action.

Order modified by granting the appellants' cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs' action. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The plaintiffs commenced this action against Carvel Corporation and its franchisees Philip and Yiola Vultaggio to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when an automobile driven by the third-party defendant Kenneth Kirschbaum went out of control and crashed into the appellants' ice cream store, striking the plaintiffs who were customers of the store. A previous action by the plaintiffs against the third-party denfendants Kirschbaum and Chrysler Corporation was settled prior to the commencement of this action.

Special Term correctly granted the motions of Kirschbaum and Chrysler Corporation to dismiss the third-party complaint, in that the prior settlement released the third-party defendants from any further liability for contribution (see, General Obligations Law § 15-108). Special Term should have additionally granted the appellants' cross motion for summary judgment against the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs' complaint alleged that the appellants negligently failed to protect them against the foreseeable risk of a vehicle "encroaching upon their structure". The duty imposed upon the appellants was to use...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Oswald v. Costco Wholesale Corp.
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • October 5, 2020
    ...P.2d 1008, 1009 (Okla. Civ. App. 1987) (vehicle "crashed through the window of Appellee's business."); Marcroft v. Carvel Corp., 120 A.D.2d 651, 502 N.Y.S.2d 245 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986) (vehicle crashing "through the storefront window"); Jefferson v. Qwik Korner Mkt., Inc. , 28 Cal.App.4th 99......
  • Cruz v. New York City Transit Authority
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 21, 1988
    ...to amend remittitur granted 46 N.Y.2d 770, 413 N.Y.S.2d 655, 386 N.E.2d 263; cf., Boltax v. Joy Day Camp, supra; Marcroft v. Carvel Corp., 120 A.D.2d 651, 502 N.Y.S.2d 245, lv. denied 68 N.Y.2d 609, 508 N.Y.S.2d 1025, 500 N.E.2d 874). For the purpose of establishing a prima facie case of ne......
  • Di Ponzio v. Riordan
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 12, 1996
    ...1066 [driver lost control of vehicle and struck plaintiff on sidewalk between parking lot and convenience store]; Marcroft v. Carvel Corp., 120 A.D.2d 651, 502 N.Y.S.2d 245, lv denied 68 N.Y.2d 609, 508 N.Y.S.2d 1025, 500 N.E.2d 874 [out-of-control vehicle crashed through defendant's ice cr......
  • Comolli v. 81 & 13 Cortland Assoc., 1
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 19, 2001
    ...of a driver losing control of his vehicle" (id., at 557; see, Grandy v Bavaro, 134 A.D.2d 957, lv denied 71 N.Y.2d 802; Marcroft v Carvel Corp., 120 A.D.2d 651, lv denied 68 N.Y.2d 609; cf., Phelan v Ferello, 207 A.D.2d 874; Arena v Ostrin, 134 A.D.2d 306). The design of the parking lot or ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT