Cobb v. Fisher
Decision Date | 27 October 1876 |
Citation | 121 Mass. 169 |
Parties | James R. Cobb v. Mary Fisher |
Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Bristol. Complaint under the mill act, Gen. Sts. c. 149. The answer set up that the respondent had a right to flow without any compensation to the complainant, because of a perpetual release and full satisfaction of all present and future damages therefor, by the former owner of the land described in the complaint; and relied upon the following paper in support thereof, recorded in the registry of deeds
At the trial in the Superior Court, before Allen J., it appeared that Warren Cobb, the signer of the paper, continued to own the land, alleged to be flowed, until his death in 1852; that the complainant derived her title, by mesne conveyances, from him; that in none of the deeds was any mention made of a right of flowage, and there was no evidence that any of the parties to the deeds knew the nature of said writing; that the respondent took her title to the mill and dam under Daniel Fisher, mentioned in said paper, and did not by her dam flow the complainant's land higher than the limit mentioned therein.
The judge ordered a verdict for the respondent, and reported the case for the consideration of this court. If the writing was a bar to the complaint, the verdict was to stand; if not, a verdict to be entered for the complainant.
Verdict for the respondent set aside, and a Verdict entered for the complainant.
J. H Dean, for the complainant.
G. Marston, for the respondent.
The writing, signed by the former owner of the land flowed, bound him personally, as a release of his own claim for pecuniary damages. Seymour v. Carter, 2 Met. 520. Smith v. Goulding, 6 Cush. 154. But it could not bind the land, nor estop subsequent grantees of the land to recover damages for the flowing thereof in the future, because it was not under seal. Fitch v....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Harrelson v. Kansas City & Atlantic Railroad Company
...v. Fielder, 91 Wis. 389; Clute v. Carr, 20 Wis. 559; Johnson v. Skillman, 29 Minn. 95; Railroad v. Railroad, 104 N.C. 658; Cobb v. Fisher, 121 Mass. 169; Batchelder v. Hibbard, 58 N.H. 269; Wiseman Locksinger, 84 N.Y. 31; Wilmington Water Co. v. Evans, 166 Ill. 548; Wilson v. Railroad, 41 M......
-
Eisenbach v. Hatfield
... ... 106; Johnson v. Skillman, 29 ... Minn. 95, 12 N.W. 149; St. Louis Stock-Yards v. Wiggins ... Ferry Co., 112 Ill. 384; Cobb v. Fisher, 121 ... Mass. 169. So the court holds that the right to future ... accretions is not a vested right, citing Taylor v ... ...
-
Burnett v. Com.
...v. Mill Co., 4 Pick. 365; Boston Water-Power Co. v. Boston & W.R. Co., 16 Pick. 512; Stevens v. Stevens, 11 Metc. (Mass.) 251; Cobb v. Fisher, 121 Mass. 169. Ladd v. City of Boston, 151 Mass. 585, 24 N.E. 858; Towne v. City of Newton, 167 Mass. 311, 45 N.E. 745; Kuschke v. City of St. Paul,......
-
Roberts v. Vest
... ... City of Troy v. Coleman, 58 Ala. 570; O'Brien v ... City of St. Paul, 18 Minn. 176 (Gil. 163); Craig v ... Lewis, 110 Mass. 377; Cobb v. Fisher, 121 Mass ... 169; Stevens v. Stevens, supra. Let the decree be affirmed at ... appellant's ... ...