122 F.3d 1056 (2nd Cir. 1995), 94-2634, Ford v. Hoke

Docket Nº:94-2634.
Citation:122 F.3d 1056
Party Name:Paul FORD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert HOKE, Superintendent, Eastern Correctional Facility, Respondent-Appellee.
Case Date:September 11, 1995
Court:United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
 
FREE EXCERPT

Page 1056

122 F.3d 1056 (2nd Cir. 1995)

Paul FORD, Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

Robert HOKE, Superintendent, Eastern Correctional Facility, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 94-2634.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

September 11, 1995

Editorial Note:

This opinion appears in the Federal reporter in a table titled "Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions". (See FI CTA2 s 0.23 regarding use of unpublished opinions)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York.

Present: WINTER, ALTIMARI and McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This cause came to be heard on the transcript of record from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, and was argued.

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is now hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of said District Court be and it hereby is affirmed.

Paul Ford appeals from Judge Weinstein's denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. He argues on appeal that he did not make a knowing and voluntary waiver of his rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), that the evidence was not sufficient beyond a reasonable doubt to convict him, and that the prosecutor's summation was so inflammatory as to deprive him of a fair trial. To the extent that Judge Weinstein's opinion does...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP