Andrews v. U.S.
Decision Date | 19 September 1997 |
Docket Number | Nos. 96-2730,s. 96-2730 |
Parties | Gloria J. ANDREWS, et al., Plaintiffs, Donald Robert Woodman, Individually and as Next Friend of Scott Forrest Woodman and as personal representative for the Estate of Yvonne E. Woodman, Yvonne E. Woodman, Deceased, Scott Forrest Woodman, Candra Dawn Woodman, Steven Dwight Woodman, Seaman Apprentice, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Counter-Claimant- Appellant, Cross-Appellee, Waste Control of Florida, Inc., Waste Management, Inc., Defendants-Cross-Claimants-Counter-Defendants- Cross-Defendants, Refuse Services, Inc., Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Counter-Defendant, Duval Garbage Company, Defendant. Alvin Lindsey SPEICHER, Gail P. Speicher, Alvin Lindsey Speicher, Jr., Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants, Skyler R. Speicher, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Counter- Claimant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, Waste Control of Florida, Inc., Waste Management, Inc., Refuse Services, Inc., Defendants-Cross-Claimants-Cross- Defendants-Counter-Defendants. Virginia Hansen SMITH, as personal representative for the Estate of Michael Stramel, deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, Michael Stramel, Plaintiff, Tina M. McBeth, Chris Hansen, Jill Hansen Leslie, Eva E. Stramel, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Cross-Defendant, Cross-Claimant, Appellant-Cross-Appellee, Waste Control of Florida, Inc., Waste Management, Inc., Refuse Services, Inc., Defendants-Cross-Claimants, Cross-Defendants. Robert C. RICHARDS, Vicki L. Richards, Michael B. Hartsfield, Jr., Plaintiffs-Appellees, Cross-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Cross-Defendant, Cross-Claimant, Counter-Claimant, Appellant-Cross-Appellee, Waste Control Of Florida, Inc., Waste Management, Inc., Defendants-Cross-Claimants, Cross-Defendants, Counter-Defendants, Refuse Services, Inc., Defendant-Cross-Defendant, CounterDefendant. Robert S. POWELL, Plaintiff-Appellee, C |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit |
To continue reading
Request your trial26 cases
-
Brandt v. Magnificent Quality Florals Corp.
...the prevailing party's degree of success when calculating a fee award constitutes an abuse of discretion. Andrews v. United States, 122 F.3d 1367, 1375 (11th Cir. 1997) (holding that district court abused its discretion by not giving greater weight to Plaintiffs' limited success). While the......
-
U.S. v. Aisenberg, 8:99-CR-324-T23MAP.
......AISENBERG replied, "None of us expects that, I don't expect that to happen .." Then STEVEN B. AISENBERG and MARLENE J. AISENBERG ..., the most important of which is the degree of the plaintiffs success in the lawsuit." Andrews v. United States, 122 F.3d 1367, 1375 (11th Cir. 1997) (citing Hensley. which emphasizes ......
-
Lucas v. White, C96-2905 TEH.
...apply to injunction actions against government employees in their official capacity for tortious conduct). 6. See also Andrews v. U.S., 122 F.3d 1367, 1374-75 (11th Cir.1997) (awarding fees under EAJA for prevailing on CERCLA claim where facts of CERCLA claim overlapped with tort claim for ......
-
California Dept of Toxic Substance v. Alco Pacific, CV.01-09294 MMM (FMOx).
...statute provides no basis for inclusion of a prayer for attorneys' fees in defendants' answers. 42. Compare Andrews v. United States, 122 F.3d 1367 (11th Cir.1997) (upholding award of attorneys' fees to plaintiffs who brought CERCLA claims against the United States under the Equal Access to......
Request a trial to view additional results