Carruth v. Ætna Life Ins. Co, (No. 3555.)
Citation | 122 S.E. 226,157 Ga. 608 |
Decision Date | 16 February 1924 |
Docket Number | (No. 3555.) |
Parties | CARRUTH. v. ÆTNA LIFE INS. CO. et al. |
Court | Supreme Court of Georgia |
(Syllabus by the Court.)
Error from Superior Court, Troup County; C. E. Roop, Judge.
Action by Lillian Carruth, administratrix of the estate of Ethel Harmon, deceased, against the Ætna Life Insurance Company and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error. Reversed.
Mrs Lillian Carruth, as administratrix of the estate of Ethel Harmon, filed a petition against the Ætna Life Insurance Company and the Lanette Cotton Mills. Both defendants are foreign corporations, but are alleged to have an agent and office in Troup county, Ga., for the purpose of transacting business. The action is based on the fact that the Ætna Life Insurance Company insured the employees of the Lanette Cotton Mills, including the decedent, under group policy No. 379, and that Ethel Harmon had departed this life on September 22, 1918, holding a "certificate" No. 937 under the provisions of the policy issued to the Lanette Cotton Mills. The policy and certificate both bear as of October 25, 1917. A copy of the certificate was attached to the original petition, and by amendment the plaintiff added a copy of the policy and the application therefor. The policy of insurance is as follows:
There are various stipulations as to renewal, payment of premiums, incontestability, additions and amount of insurance, termination for discontinued employment, settlement of premiums, etc., which are immaterial in this case. In the application of the Lanette Cotton Mills (which is made a part of the policy) for group life insurance upon the annual renewable-term plan, renewable for 49 years, with premiums payable annually, upon the lives of its employees, it is stated that the said employees are engaged in the kind of work usual to cotton mill employees. The application proceeds as follows:
In the fourth paragraph of the petition the plaintiff alleged that the Insurance was given to the deceased Ethel Harmon in considera tion of the continued and faithful services of the deceased, and shows that the Lanette Cotton Mills delivered a certificate of insurance under said group policy to Ethel Harmon and other employees of the said mill, in order to make their employment with the mill more attractive to them and in appreciation of the employees' faithful service to said mill. It is alleged that at the time of the issuance of the policy and certificate of insurance Ethel Harmon was an employee of the defendant mill company, and continued in that capacity until May——, 1918, when she was taken sick in the mill and carried to her home; that at this time she was too sick to obtain written consent; that the superintendent had actual notice of her sickness; and that after having been sick from May ——, 1918, until September 22, 1918, she died on the latter date. In another paragraph it is alleged that Ethel Harmon had never been dismissed from the employment of the mill, and had worked faithfully, and had never quit her employment, and that at the time she had to leave the mill she only left temporarily, hoping soon to regain her health; and that her sickness was well known to the mill company, the overseer, and many other officers inquiring frequently as to her condition. She left neither husband nor child and neither father nor mother. The petitioner was appointed temporary administratrix on her estate on August 15, 1921. The certificate attached to the petition is as follows:
As a part of the certificate is a statement of the benefits as set forth in the application, and an address, "To our Employees, " as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Shea v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.
... ... No ... person is specifically named in the insurance contract as the ... be decided. Compare Carruth v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., ... 157 Ga. 608, 616, 122 S.E. 226. At least ... ...
-
Rider v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 58564
... ... WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION et al ... No. 58564 ... Court of Appeals of Georgia ... Compare Lipshitz v. New Zealand Ins. Co., 34 Ga.App. 825, 131 S.E. 924 (1926); olitan Life Ins. Co. v. Fields, 53 Ga.App. 76, 79, 184 S.E ... Compare Carruth v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 157 Ga. 608, 122 S.E. 226 ... ...
-
Board of Ins. Com'rs v. Great Southern Life Ins. Co.
... ... COM'RS et al ... GREAT SOUTHERN LIFE INS. CO. et al ... No. A-2886 ... Supreme Court of Texas ... May 2, 1951 ... Rehearing ... See also Carruth v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 157 Ga. 608, [150 Tex. 268] 122 S.E. 226 and ... ...
-
Lancaster v. Travelers Ins. Co
...54 Ga.App. 718189 S.E. 79LANCASTER.v.TRAVELERS INS. CO.No. 25513.Court of Appeals of Georgia, Division No. 1.Dec. 3, ... Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Harrod, 46 Ga.App. 127, 128, 166 ... are interlocked like the Siamese twins." Carruth v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 157 Ga. 608, 616, 122 S.E. 226, ... ...