New Process Fermentation v. Maus
Decision Date | 27 May 1887 |
Citation | 7 S.Ct. 1304,30 L.Ed. 1193,122 U.S. 413 |
Parties | NEW PROCESS FERMENTATION Co. v. MAUS and others. 1 |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Ephraim Banning, Thos. A. Banning, and Wells: W. Leggett, for appellant.
C. P. Jacobs, for appellees.
This is a suit in equity, brought in the circuit court of the United States for the district of Indiana, by the New Process Fermentation Company, an Illinois corporation, against Magdalena Maus, Albert C. Maus, Casper J. Maus, Frank A. Maus, and Mathias A. Maus, for the infringement of letters a tent No. 215,679, granted May 20, 1879, to George Bartholomae, as assignee of Leonard Meller and Edmund Hofmann, as inventors, for an 'improvement in processes for making beer,' subject to the limitation prescribed by section 4887 of the Revised Statutes, by reason of the inventions having been patented in France, November, 30, 1876, and in Belgium, February 28, 1877. The specification and drawing and claims of the patent are as follows:
'To all whom it may concern: Be it known that we, Leonard Meller, of Ludwigshafen-on-the-Rhine, in the state of Bavaria, and Edmund Hofmann, of Mannheim, in the state of Baden, Germany, have invented certain new and useful improvements in the art of making beer, and we hereby declare the following to be a full, clear, and exact description thereof, reference being had to the accompanying drawing, making a part of this specification, in which the figure represents an end view of our apparatus, with the water column in section.
'The object of our invention is to overcome the difficulties above named, and also to produce in a shorter time a better quality of beer, containing more sugar and less alcohol.
, by means of flexible sections, k, provided with couplings. The taps or connections have valves, i' i'. Pipe a' bends upward, and passes above the level of a water column, C, and then, passing downward, enters the base of the column at x, where it is provided with a cock, b'. , centrally located, so that, should the escape of the gas become so rapid as to lift the body of water upward, the water will be arrested by the diaphragm, while the gas escapes around its edges. It is evident that the pressure in all the shavings casks connected with pipe a' will be equal, and will be kept so indefinitely by means of the water column, and, as far as the enlivening of the beer is concerned, it is always ready for market, be it ten days or four monh s, whereas in processes now practiced beer has to be bunged at a particular time for a particular day's market. Our process enables the brewer to keep on hand merchantable beer, which can be shipped instantly, or, if trade decreases, it enables him to keep his stock on hand without deterioration till the demand is made for it. All that has been said above in relation to a series of casks applies, of course, equally to treatment in a single cask.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Application of Tarczy-Hornoch
...of nature for a practical purpose. 158 U.S. at 77, 15 S.Ct. 745. See e. g., Telephone Cases, supra; New Process Fermentation Co. v. Maus, 122 U.S. 413, 7 S.Ct. 1304, 30 L.Ed. 1193 (1887). The Court then cited Corning v. Burden, supra; Wyeth v. Stone, supra, and several fairly contemporaneou......
-
Schumacher v. Buttonlath Mfg. Co.
... ... patent No. 1,259,049, and for the completion of the processes ... described in the process patents-- in all six patents, ... containing thirty-six claims ... These ... patents ... suggestion whatever of all the possible processes to which it ... may be adapted. Fermentation Co. v. Maus, 122 U.S ... 413, 428. If the mere fact that a prior device might be made ... ...
-
Chisholm v. Johnson
... ... of letters patent No. 499,397, granted to Robert P. Scott, ... June 13, 1893, for a process of gathering and hulling green ... peas from the vines, sustained, and held to have been ... 279; Eames v. Andrews, 122 U.S ... 40, 7 Sup.Ct. 1073, 30 L.Ed. 1064; Fermentation Co. v ... Maus, 122 U.S. 413, 7 Sup.Ct. 1304, 30 L.Ed. 1103; ... Lawther v. Hamilton, 124 ... ...
-
Manhattan General Const Co. v. Helios-Upton Co.
... ... But, more ... than this, to support a method or process patent there must ... be a tangible product or a change in character or quality ... brought ... L.Ed. 279; Wicke v. Ostrum, 103 U.S. 461, 26 L.Ed ... 409; New Process Fermentation Co. v. Maus, 122 U.S ... 413, 7 Sup.Ct. 1304, 30 L.Ed. 1103; Risdon Locomotive Co ... v ... ...