123 S.E. 651 (S.C. 1924), 11525, Poulnot v. Cantwell
|Citation:||123 S.E. 651, 129 S.C. 171|
|Opinion Judge:||MARION, J.|
|Party Name:||POULNOT v. CANTWELL ET AL.|
|Attorney:||J. N. Nathans, of Charleston, for petitioner. Whaley, Barnwell & Grimball, of Charleston, for John B. Reeves, intervener. John I. Cosgrove and James Allan, both of Charleston, for respondents.|
|Case Date:||June 09, 1924|
|Court:||Supreme Court of South Carolina|
Action in the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court by E. H. Poulnot, on behalf of himself and all other taxpayers in the county of Charleston in like plight, who may join in this action and share in the cost thereof, against W. P. Cantwell and others, constituting the County Board of Commissioners of Charleston county, and John P. Deveaux and others, constituting the Cooper River Ferry Commission. Petition dismissed.
The title and preamble of the resolution referred to in the opinion follows:
"The State of South Carolina.
At a General Assembly begun to be holden at Columbia, on the second Tuesday in January, in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred and twenty-four, and thence continued by divers adjournments to the _____ day of _____. In the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred and twenty-four.
A Joint Resolution.
To create a Cooper River Ferry Commission and to authorize, empower, and direct them to operate a public ferry in Charleston county, from the city of Charleston to Mount Pleasant or to the mainland to the west therefrom at or near Hog Island and to Sullivan's Island, all of which places are in Charleston county; to provide for the construction and maintenance of vehicular communication from
the eastern terminus of said ferry to Mount Pleasant and between Sullivan's Island and Mount Pleasant; to provide for the borrowing of money by the county of Charleston for the purchase and construction of wharves, landings, boats, roads, approaches, embankments, trestles, and bridges adjacent and appurtenant thereto and for the maintenance and operation of same; and for the carrying out such projects to arrange for the borrowing of money by the county of Charleston and to provide for a tax levy to meet the interest and create a sinking fund.
Whereas, the entire mainland of Charleston county east of the Cooper river is cut off from regular and reliable communication with the remainder of the said county; and
Whereas, Sullivan's Island in Charleston is also cut off from regular and reliable communication with the mainland of Charleston county; and,
Whereas, the purchase and construction of the necessary wharves, landings, boats, approaches, embankments, trestles, and bridges necessary to the establishment of a public ferry across the Cooper river, with wharves or landings in the city of Charleston, the town of Mount Pleasant, or on the mainland to the west therefrom at or near Hog Island and Sullivan's Island and a public thoroughfare from the eastern terminus thereof to Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, and a public thoroughfare crossing the Cove Inlet from Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, to Sullivan's Island, South Carolina, [129 S.C. 175] will cost Five Hundred Thousand ($500,000,00) Dollars.
Whereas, the proposed public ferry will be a part of the highway system of this state, and the establishment, maintenance, and operation thereof is an ordinary county purpose; therefore," etc.
Action in the original jurisdiction of this court to enjoin the county board of commissioners of Charleston county
and the Cooper river ferry commission from issuing certain notes as obligations of Charleston county, pursuant to the enabling provisions of a Joint Resolution of the General Assembly, approved the 5th day of March, 1924, creating the Cooper river ferry commission, vesting it with certain powers, imposing certain duties, and authorizing the creation of certain indebtedness, etc. The plaintiff, [129 S.C. 176] Poulnot, and an intervener, Reeves, as resident taxpayers, base their right to injunctive relief upon the alleged unconstitutionality of the foregoing Joint Resolution.
The questions raised, which will be considered in the order presented by counsel, are to be resolved in the light of the familiar and well-settled general rule that every presumption must be indulged in favor of the constitutionality of an act of the Legislature, and that courts should not declare a statute unconstitutional unless the invalidity is manifest beyond a reasonable doubt. Battle v. Willcox (S. C.) 122 S.E. 516.
First, it is urged that said Joint Resolution is violative of section 17, article 3, of the Constitution, providing that "every act or resolution * * * shall relate to but one subject, and that shall be expressed in the title." The title and preamble of this Resolution should be set out in the report of the case.
It is suggested (a) that the Resolution relates to more than one subject, in that it provides for the operation of a ferry from the city of Charleston to Mount Pleasant and to Sullivan's Island, which is one subject, and also provides for the construction and maintenance of vehicular communication from the eastern terminus of said ferry to Mount Pleasant and between Sullivan's Island and Mount Pleasant, which is another subject. Strictly in rhetoric, and more often in general use, "subject" is the broad word for anything written or spoken about. Century Dictionary. As used in this section of the Constitution, "subject" is the thing legislated about, or the matter or matters upon which the legislation operates, to accomplish a definite object, or objects reasonably related one to the other. Obviously, we think, the subject of the Resolution here in question is "communication," connoting travel and transportation, between one part of Charleston county and another. The definite object of the legislation is to provide the means of such communication. The means, broadly, is that of a [129 S.C. 177] highway for travel and transportation over land and water between the points sought to be put into that kind of communication with each other. From the facts recited in the preamble of the Resolution, which facts are here undisputed, it appears that the establishment of the form of communication contemplated necessarily involves the provision of means of travel and transportation over both land and water. Hence it would seem clear that the provisions contained in the Resolution as to ferriage over...
To continue readingFREE SIGN UP