Vetco Concrete Co. v. Troy Lumber Co., 381
Decision Date | 18 April 1962 |
Docket Number | No. 381,381 |
Citation | 124 S.E.2d 905,256 N.C. 709 |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Parties | VETCO CONCRETE COMPANY, v. TROY LUMBER COMPANY. |
Weston P. Hatfield, Winston-Salem, for plaintiff.
David H. Armstrong, Troy, for defendant.
The defendant assigns as error the refusal of the court below to sustain its motion for judgment as of nonsuit at the close of all the evidence.
The plaintiff's evidence establishes unequivocally that all the materials furnished by it which went into the construction of residences built on defendant's lots were furnished pursuant to an express contract between the plaintiff and the Fore-Taylor Building Company, a corporation. The plaintiff's evidence goes further and affirmatively establishes the fact that the materials were not sold on the credit of Troy Lumber Company.
It is equally clear from plaintiff's evidence that the plaintiff never entered into any agreement with the defendant to pay for the materials it furnished Fore-Taylor Building Company. Moreover, it never knew that the defendant Troy Lumber Company owned any of the lots on which Fore-Taylor Building Company constructed residences until all the materials had been sold and delivered to Fore-Taylor Building Company and the account was four or five months past due.
It is a well established principle that an express contract precludes an implied contract with reference to the same matter. Ranlo Supply Co. v. Clark, 247 N.C. 762, 102 S.E.2d 257; Jenkins v. Duckworth & Shelton, Inc., 242 N.C. 758, 89 S.E.2d 471; Crowell v. Air Lines, 240 N.C. 20, 81 S.E.2d 178; McLean v. Keith, 236 N.C. 59, 72 S.E.2d 44; Morganton Manufacturing & Trading Co. v. Andrews, 165 N.C. 285, 81 S.E. 418, Ann.Cas.1916A 763; Lawrence v. Hester, 93 N.C. 79; Klebe v. United States, 263 U.S. 188, 44 S.Ct. 58, 68 L.Ed. 244; 12 Am.Jur., Contracts, Section 7, page 505; 17 C.J.S. Contracts § 5, page 321 et seq.
It is stated in 12 Am.Jur., Contracts, Section 7, page 505: citing, among other cases, Manufacturing Co. v. Andrews, supra, and McLean v. Keith, supra. It is further stated in a footnote that, 'Perhaps it is more precise to state that where the parties have made a contract for themselves, covering the whole subject matter, no promise is implied by law.
The case of Ranlo Supply Co. v. Clark, supra, is directly in point. There, the defendant's son, Floyd Clark, engaged John F. Smith, to furnish labor and materials necessary to construct a house on land owned by the defendants. The plaintiff furnished materials pursuant to an agreement with Smith. The plaintiff never entered into any agreement with the defendants to pay for the materials furnished, nor did it discuss the subject with them until after the materials were purchased by Smith and used by him in the construction of the house. This Court held, under these facts, that there was no implied contract under which the defendants were liable for the value of the materials furnished by the plaintiff. This Court stated:
'* * * (W)hatever contract was made with the plaintiff with respect to the purchase of these materials was made with Smith and not with the owners of the property.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Forstmann v. Culp
...maintain a quantum meruit claim where an enforceable express contract covers the same subject matter. Vetco Concrete Co. v. Troy Lumber Co., 256 N.C. 709, 124 S.E.2d 905 (1962); Industrial and Textile Piping, Inc. v. Industrial Rigging Services, Inc., 69 N.C.App. 511, 317 S.E.2d 47, review ......
-
The Charlotte–mecklenburg Hosp. Auth. v. Talford
...principle that an express contract precludes an implied contract with reference to the same matter.” Concrete Co. v. Lumber Co., 256 N.C. 709, 713, 124 S.E.2d 905, 908 (1962) (citations omitted). However, “[w]here there is an express agreement to pay, but the amount is not specified, the pe......
-
In re Southeastern Eye Center-Pending Matters
... ... v. City Roofing & ... Sheetmetal Co. , 73 N.C.App. 470, 472, 326 S.E.2d 632, ... 633 ... contract." Id. (citing Vetco Concrete Co ... v. Troy Lumber Co. , 256 N.C ... ...
-
Snyder v. Freeman
...be no implied contract between them covering the same subject matter dealt with in the express agreement. Vetco Concrete Company v. Troy Lumber Co., 256 N.C. 709, 124 S.E.2d 905 (1962). In this case, plaintiff had furnished materials for the building of various houses under an express agree......