State v. Evans

Citation126 S.E. 607,189 N.C. 233
Decision Date04 March 1925
Docket Number49.
PartiesSTATE v. EVANS.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of North Carolina

126 S.E. 607

189 N.C. 233

STATE
v.
EVANS.

No. 49.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

March 4, 1925


Appeal from Superior Court, Nash County; Lyon, Judge.

Cheatam Evans was convicted of murder in the first degree, and death sentence pronounced, and he appeals. Affirmed.

Criminal prosecution tried upon an indictment charging the defendant with murder in the first degree. From an adverse verdict finding the defendant guilty of the capital felony as charged in the bill of indictment, and judgment of death pronounced thereon, he appeals, assigning errors.

Admission of statement of deceased in accused's presence not reversible error.

F. S. Spruill, Jr., of Rocky Mount, for appellant.

D. G. Brummitt, Atty. Gen., and Frank Nash, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

STACY, J.

On July 26, 1924, about 8 or 8:30 p. m., A. L. Joyner, a jitney driver in the town of Hollister, Halifax county, was employed to make a trip down into Nash county, where the defendant lives. He had in his car Tom Lee, Ernest Lee, and the defendant, Cheatam Evans. Soon after arriving at the defendant's home, the driver of the car, A. L. Joyner, was shot twice and almost instantly killed. The state contended that the deceased was shot and killed by the defendant. The defense, on the other hand, contended that Ernest Lee did the shooting, while the defendant was in his house and away from the scene of the homicide. There was evidence tending to support the two contentions, and the jury took the state's view of the matter.

It was in evidence that the deceased was shot with a gun belonging to the defendant; that the car with Joyner's body in it was driven to Davis' bridge, some distance away, where the bloody footmat of the car was thrown into the creek; that the car was driven from there to another creek where Joyner's body was thrown into the water; that a watch taken from the defendant was Joyner's watch, and, when Joyner's body was found, his watch chain was in the button hole of his shirt; and that a knife taken from the defendant was similar to one owned by Joyner. Early in the morning, following the night of the homicide, the defendant came to the home of Washington Lynch, driving Joyner's automobile, and wanted to borrow some license plates. There was other evidence tending to show the defendant's guilt.

The defendant, a witness in his own behalf, testified that he was invited by Tom and Ernest Lee to ride with them in Joyner's car, as they were going down into Nash...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT