Galley v. Galley

Decision Date01 July 1882
PartiesSPRINGER GALLEY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. ALVIN GALLEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
CourtNebraska Supreme Court

MOTION suggesting diminution of record.

MOTION OVERRULED.

W. A. Bergstresser, for the motion.

D. W. Barker, contra.

OPINION

BY THE COURT

This case was tried at the May, 1881, term of the district court of Nuckolls county, a jury being waived, the cause submitted to the court, and judgment rendered in favor of the defendant. The cause is brought into this court by petition in error. The plaintiff in error has filed a motion, properly verified, suggesting diminution of the record, the alleged defects being the failure of the clerk to incorporate in the record the verdict of the jury in a former trial of the case, which took place in the year 1880, and also a motion for a new trial filed at that time. The verdict rendered at that time seems to have been set aside, and no question in relation to that trial is now before the court. All matters in relation to that trial were therefore properly omitted from the record. Only such matter should be included in the record as is necessary to a correct understanding of the case, and if more than this is added the costs occasioned thereby will be taxed to the party at fault.

The motion suggesting diminution is overruled.

MOTION OVERRULED.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Frank Moores v. State ex rel. Shoop
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • 8 d5 Abril d5 1898
    ...only what is essential to a correct understanding of the case. (Morgan v. Larsh, 1 Neb. 361; Smith v. Fife, 2 Neb. 10; Galley v. Galley, 13 Neb. 200, 13 N.W. 172; Hilton v. Bachman, 24 Neb. 490, 39 N.W. 419.) conclusion is that the facts stated in the alternative writ do not show that the r......
  • Moores v. State ex rel. Shoop
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • 8 d5 Abril d5 1898
    ...only what is essential to a correct understanding of the case. Morgan v. Larsh, 1 Neb. 361;Smith v. Fife, 2 Neb. 10;Galley v. Galley, 13 Neb. 200, 13 N. W. 172;Hilton v. Bachman, 24 Neb. 490, 39 N. W. 419. Our conclusion is that the facts stated in the alternative writ do not show that the ......
  • Hilton v. Bachman
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • 26 d3 Setembro d3 1888
    ...such portion should be included in a transcript brought to this court as is necessary to a correct understanding of the case. Galley v. Galley, 13 Neb. 200, 13 N. W. Rep. 172. A party to a proceeding in the district court, where such court has jurisdiction over the parties and subject-matte......
  • Fitzgerald v. Hollingsworth
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • 1 d6 Julho d6 1882

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT