United States v. Fullard-Leo

Citation133 F.2d 743
Decision Date04 March 1943
Docket NumberNo. 9889.,9889.
PartiesUNITED STATES v. FULLARD-LEO et al.
CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)

Norman M. Littell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Angus M. Taylor, Jr., U. S. Atty., of Honolulu, T. H., and Robert P. Marquis and Vernon L. Wilkinson, Attys., Department of Justice, both of Washington, D. C. for appellant.

A. G. M. Robertson, of Honolulu, T. H. (Robertson, Castle & Anthony, of Honolulu, T. H., of counsel), for appellees Leslie Fullard-Leo and Ellen Fullard-Leo.

E. H. Beebe of Honolulu, T. H. (Smith, Wild, Beebe & Cades, of Honolulu, T. H., of counsel), for appellees Cooper et al.

Before GARRECHT, HANEY, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.

HANEY, Circuit Judge.

Appeal was taken from a judgment dismissing an action brought by appellant to quiet title to Palmyra Island.

Palmyra Island is an atoll comprising some 52 islets surrounding three deep-water lagoons, and is situated about 900 miles south of Honolulu. Many of the islets are covered with trees and tropical vegetation. It was discovered by Captain Sawle of the American ship Palmyra on November 6, 1802.

There was evidence, excluded by the court below, that one G. P. Judd, on October 19, 1859, visited the island and left "a bottle containing notice of taking possession".

Prior to February 26, 1862, Wilkinson and Bent, naturalized citizens of the Kingdom of Hawaii, made a "representation to the Kingdom. The "representation" itself cannot be found. The minutes of a meeting of the Cabinet Council on February 26, 1862, contain the following:

"`P. Kamehameha read a Representation from Z Bent & Mr Wilkinson, about the Island Palmyra, requesting that the Island should be considered a Hawaiian possession & be placed under the Hawaiian Flag

"`After some discussion it pleased the King to direct the Minister of the Interior, to grant what the Petitioners apply for, following the precedent of the Resolution regarding the Island Cornwallis & without exceeding the same.'"

The "precedent" referred to an expedition regarding a similar situation, the facts concerning which will be related before continuing the chronology of Palmyra Island.

The precedent of the resolution regarding Cornwallis Island was: On May 24, 1858, one Adams submitted a letter to the Minister of Interior stating that he was desirous of taking possession of an island or islands in the North Pacific in the name of the Hawaiian Government, provided that the government would grant him certain rights. On May 31, 1858, Adams entered into a contract with the Minister of the Interior on behalf of the Hawaiian government, by which Adams was given "the exclusive right for five years of taking guano or any other produce which may be found on any Island or Islands in the North Pacific Ocean taken possession of, in the name of His Majesty King * * * by Samuel Clesson Allen in the Schooner `Kalama'." There followed definite provisions respecting payment to the government, operation of the business by Adams and avoidance of the contract by default. A provision below the signatures was "that if it shall afterwards appear, that any Island or Islands which have been taken possession of by L. C. Allen in the name of H. Majesty * * * had been previously taken possession of by a foreign power — then, this contract shall be void, so far as relates to such Island or Islands". On the same day a commission was issued to Allen empowering him to take possession in the name of the King "any Island or Islands in the North Pacific which are not in the possession of any other Government, or any other people * * *".

On July 12, 1858, Allen reported that on June 14, 1858, he took possession of Cornwallis Island. The minutes of the Privy Council of July 27, 1858, disclose that the report was read, and a resolution adopted stating that the island was "to be considered as part of His Majesty's Domain".

The court below found that the contract with the Adams "was rescinded by the Minister of Interior, as to Cornwallis Island, shortly thereafter when it was discovered that that island had been annexed by the United States prior to the time when Allen arrived there on June 14, 1858", and that the "Minister of Interior, wrote to Adams on October 16, 1858, that the government was embarrassed when it learned that the Island Cornwallis (later known as Johnston Island) taken under Allen's commission, had already been annexed by the United States".

Returning to the Wilkinson and Bent chronology, we find that on the day following the passage of the resolution, a newspaper in Honolulu contained the following:

"The sloop Louisa has been purchased by J. Wilkinson, and is now being fitted for a southern expedition, under command of Captain Zenas Bent. We understand she will take possession of an island during her cruise * * *."

On March 1, 1862, the Minister of the Interior wrote Wilkinson and Bent in part as follows:

"* * * I am authorized to State on the part of his Majesty's government that they consent to the taking possession of the island Palmyra * * * for the purpose of increasing the trade and Commerce of this Kingdom, as well as offering protection to the interests of its subjects —

"I have the honor to forward with this dispatch the Authority * * * to take possession of the above mentioned island of Palmyra, and I beg to request that you will after having executed the orders contained in the Commission, you will report the fact to this Department * * *."

The commission referred to was dated the same day, signed by the King and the Minister of the Interior and authorized Bent "to take possession in our name of Palmyra Island * * * not having been taken possession of by any other government or any other people". It also contained directions as to the method of taking possession, as follows: "* * * by erecting thereon a short pole, with the Hawaiian flag wrapped around it and interring at the foot thereof a bottle well corked containing a paper signed by him in the following form, viz.: `Visited and taken possession of by order of His Majesty King Kamehameha IV, for him and his successors on the Hawaiian throne, by the undersigned * * *' * * *."

A "Memoranda" published in the government gazette on June 14, 1862, stated that Captain Bent had sailed on March 28, 1862, and had arrived at Palmyra Island on April 6, 1862.

On June 16, 1862, Bent wrote the Minister of the Interior stating that he had taken "possession of Palmyra Island, in the name of His Majesty on April 15, 1862; that he left on the island one white man and four Hawaiians; that he planted some vegetables thereon; and that he proposed to return to the island in about ten days. On June 18, 1862, the Minister of the Interior published a "Proclamation" in the gazette reciting that Captain Bent had taken possession of Palmyra Island on April 15, 1862, and "This is to give notice, that the said island, so taken possession of, is henceforth to be considered and respected as part of the Domain of the King of the Hawaiian Islands".

Bent conveyed all his "right, title and interest" in the island to Wilkinson on December 24, 1862. In 1885, Pacific Navigation Company, a Hawaiian corporation, became a successor in interest to Wilkinson after previous conveyances. Assessment for taxes was made against the corporation in 1885, 1886, 1887, the valuation of the island being fixed at $1,000. The corporation disposed of its interest in the island during the last named year, and no taxes were levied against the island until 1911.

Hawaii was a monarchy from 1795 to 1893 when the monarchy was abolished and after an intervening provisional government a republic was established. The joint resolution of Congress, approved July 7, 1898, 30 Stat. 750, recited that the Government of the Republic of Hawaii had consented "to cede absolutely and without reserve to the United States of America all rights of sovereignty of whatsoever kind in and over the Hawaiian Islands and their dependencies, and also to cede and transfer to the United States the absolute fee and ownership of all public, Government, or Crown lands * * * and all other public property of every kind and description belonging to the Government of the Hawaiian Islands * * *." It provided that the cession was accepted and that the Hawaiian Islands and their dependencies were "annexed as a part of the territory of the United States and are subject to the sovereign dominion thereof, and that all and singular the property and rights hereinbefore mentioned are vested in the United States of America". "Though the resolution was passed July 7, the formal transfer was not made until August 12, when, at noon of that day, the American flag was raised over the government house, and the islands ceded with appropriate ceremonies to a representative of the United States". Territory of Hawaii v. Mankichi, 190 U.S. 197, 209, 23 S.Ct. 787, 47 L.Ed. 1016.

The court below stated that appellant had asked it to take judicial notice of "U.S. Senate Document 16, 55th Congress, 3rd Session. Message of the President of the United States transmitting the Report of the Hawaiian Commission in pursuance of the Joint Resolution to provide for annexing the Hawaiian Islands to the United States"; that in such document an itemized inventory of all government property and lands and interests in lands; that Palmyra Island is not listed as government property, but is listed as a part of the Hawaiian group; and that the report contains the following:

"The Public Domain. — The statistics available in regard to the public lands belonging to the Republic of Hawaii at the time of the cession to the United States are not of that absolute or definite character that they can be accepted as conclusive of areas and values.

"The frequent radical changes in the past years in the methods of control and of sales and leases and transfers of lands under the direction of the Crown * * * have made it difficult to arrive at...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Kingman Reef Atoll Dev., L.L.C. v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Claims Court
    • 30 Junio 2014
    ...vegetation, surrounding three deep-water lagoons." See United States v. Fullard-Leo, 66 F. Supp. 774, 775 (D. Haw. 1940), rev'd, 133 F.2d 743 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 319 U.S. 748 (1943). In 1862, Johnson Wilkinson and Zenas Bent, citizens of the Kingdom of Hawaii, "made a 'representation'......
  • United States v.
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • 12 Mayo 1947
    ...the United States and, therefore, is not entitled to any relief prayed for.' On appeal, the Court of Appeals reversed. United States v. Fullard-Leo, 9 Cir., 133 F.2d 743. It concluded that the commission to Bent, heretofore referred to, 'makes it abundantly clear that Bent was merely acting......
  • Atlantis Development Corporation v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • 12 Junio 1967
    ...authorities to support its contention that it could acquire a valid title by this discovery and occupation: United States v. Fullard-Leo, 9 Cir., 1943, 133 F.2d 743, 746, reversing D.C.Haw., 1940, 66 F.Supp. 774, cert. denied Hawaii v. Fullard-Leo, 319 U.S. 748, 63 S.Ct. 1157, 87 L.Ed. 1703......
  • United States v. Fullard-Leo
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 14 Octubre 1946
    ...judgment of dismissal because of insufficiency of the proof to exhibit title in the United States. This court reversed, United States v. Fullard-Leo, 9 Cir., 133 F.2d 743; and on remand the defendants (appellees) were permitted to amend their answers and a second trial was had,1 the outcome......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT