Western Conference of Original Free Will Baptists of N. C. v. Miles

Decision Date17 January 1964
Docket NumberNo. 672,672
Citation134 S.E.2d 165,261 N.C. 179
PartiesThe WESTERN CONFERENCE OF ORIGINAL FREE WILL BAPTISTS OF NORTH CAROLINA, an unincorporated religious association, et al. v. James A. MILES et al.
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court

Arthur Vann and R. Roy Mitchell, Jr., Durham, for plaintiffs.

Bryant, Lipton, Bryant & Battle, Durham, Lake, Boyce & Lake, Raleigh, for defendants.

PER CURIAM.

We have heard appeals in this case, and related cases, on two prior occasions--at the Fall Term 1961, and the Fall Term 1962. Western Conference of Original Free Will Baptists of North Carolina v. Creech, 256 N.C. 128, 123 S.E.2d 619; Western Conference of Original Free Will Baptists of North Carolina v. Miles, 259 N.C. 1, 129 S.E.2d 600. These prior opinions set out the pleadings and the law applicable to the matters in controversy. The latter opinion (filed 6 March 1963) summarizes the evidence adduced at the trial in Superior Court held in March 1962. That opinion is the law of the case. We ordered a new trial for reasons set out in the opinion.

There was a retrial in August 1963. From this the present appeal arises. This trial was begun on 5 August and terminated on 22 August. Plaintiffs and defendants introduced voluminous evidence. Defendants moved for nonsuit at the end of plaintiffs' evidence and again at the close of all of the evidence. The motions were overruled. The court charged the jury and submitted the case to them upon proper issues. After the jury had deliberated about two hours, the judge withdrew the case from the jury, entered a judgment of nonsuit and therein dismissed the action and made other decrees bearing upon the matters in controversy. In allowing the motion for nonsuit and entering the judgment, the court fell into error. The evidence, considered in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, makes out a prima facie case for plaintiffs on all material issues of fact. No purpose can be served by a review of the evidence here.

The ruling of the court on the motion to nonsuit is reversed and the judgment below will be vacated.

Reversed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Patton v. State of North Carolina, Civ. No. 2397.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of North Carolina
    • July 20, 1966
    ... ... "COURT: Before I announce punishment, I will take into consideration the fact that he has ... four years and four months after the original eligibility date. If ineligibility for parole be ... 529, 42 S.Ct. 188, 66 L.Ed. 352 (1922); Western Union Telegraph Co. v. State of Kansas, 216 U.S ... "Sir the other defendant in this case was set free after serving 15 months of his sentence, I have ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT