United States Bobbin & Shuttle Co. v. Thissell
Decision Date | 03 November 1904 |
Docket Number | 522. |
Citation | 137 F. 1 |
Parties | UNITED STATES BOBBIN & SHUTTLE CO. v. THISSELL. [1] |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit |
William M. Richardson, Cyrus M. Van Slyck, and Van Slyck & Mumford for plaintiff in error.
Warren Ozro Kyle, for defendant in error.
Before COLT, Circuit Judge, and BROWN and LOWELL, District Judges.
This is an action at law to recover the balance of wages due upon an account annexed. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff, and the defendant's exceptions are before us. We need consider but one question.
The plaintiff was in the defendant's employ at a rate of wages in dispute between the plaintiff and the defendant. The defendant admitted that it owed the plaintiff a certain sum. The plaintiff contended that the debt was larger. Under these circumstances the defendant wrote the plaintiff as follows:
An account was inclosed, and a receipt as follows: '$464.22 Check No. 6151 No.... .
'Received from U.S. Bobbin & Shuttle Co., Four hundred & sixty-four 22/100 Dollars, being balance of salary due to and including week ending Sept. 7, 1901, as per statement rendered.'
To this the plaintiff replied as follows:
The receipt was neither signed nor returned.
The defendant moved that the jury be instructed to return a verdict for the defendant on the grounds:
This motion was refused, and the defendant thereupon requested the following instructions:
These requests were refused by the learned judge, who charged the jury:
'(3) That it was for the jury to determine whether the correspondence of September 20 and 21, 1901, and the acts of the parties thereunder,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Swindell v. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co.
... ... v. YOUNGSTOWN SHEET & TUBE CO. No. 2676.United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.February 8, 1916 ... United States ... Bobbin & Shuttle Co. v. Thissell, 137 F. 1 and 3, 69 ... C.C.A ... ...
-
Yazoo & MVR Co. v. Webb
...v. Sideboard, 161 Miss. 4, 133 So. 669; Nassoiy v. Tomlinson, 148 N. Y. 326, 42 N. E. 715, 51 Am. St. Rep. 695; United States Bobbin, etc., Co. v. Thissell (C. C. A.) 137 F. 1; Samuels v. E. F. Drew & Co. (D. C.) 7 F.(2d) 764, affirmed (C. C. A.) 7 F.(2d) 766; Schwartzenberg v. Mayerson (C.......
-
Samuels v. EF Drew & Co.
...that the monthly checks were to be taken as full payment, it would have been a good accord and satisfaction. U. S. Bobbin, etc., Co. v. Thissell, 137 F. 1, 69 C. C. A. 651; Id., 157 F. 1005, 85 C. C. A. 680 (C. C. A. 1); Swindell v. Youngstown, etc., Co., 230 F. 438, 144 C. C. A. 580 (C. C.......
-
Ansberry v. Harrah
...what constitutes accord and satisfaction is generally supported by the courts. Preston v. Grant, 34 Vt. 201; United States Bobbin & Shuttle Company v. Thissell (C.C.A.) 137 F. 1; Fuller v. Kemp, 138 N.Y. 231, 33 N.E. 1034, 20 L.R.A. 785; Chicago, M. & St. P. R. Co. v. Clark, 178 U.S. 353, 2......