Krause v. Pope
Decision Date | 24 October 1890 |
Citation | 14 S.W. 616 |
Parties | KRAUSE <I>et al.</I> v. POPE. |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Appeal from district court, Travis county; W. M. KEY, Judge.
N. G. Shelley and J. D. Guinn, for appellants. John D. Templeton, for appellee.
This suit was brought by J. H. Pope, the appellee, on the 12th day of February, 1889, upon two promissory notes, and to foreclose liens upon certain tracts of land. Both notes were made by Krause, and were payable to the order of John Hancock. Both were for the sum of $3,000 and dated June 23, 1875. Both retained a vendor's lien upon land described, and bore interest from date at the rate of 10 per cent. per annum. One of them became due in 12 months and the other one in 24 months after date. The last-described note expressed that the interest on it was to be paid "annually." The petition charged, and the evidence showed, that both notes were transferred by Hancock to the plaintiff on the 12th day of August, 1878. For the purpose of foreclosing the lien, in addition to the maker of the notes, (F. Krause, Sr.,) the following parties, who claimed interests in the land, were made defendants: F. Krause, Jr., J. Halm, Louis Krause, Theo. Heise, and Margaretha Krause, the wife of F. Krause, Sr. The petition charged that on the ____ day of ____ 1878, The exhibit was attached, and reads as follows: The petition further avers that "in the said writing the said Krause, Sr., acknowledged himself as bound for said consideration to pay the said rate of 12 per cent. interest, payable annually, from June 23, 1878, to the said J. H. Pope, plaintiff herein." The petition further charged "that on the 19th day of February, 1884, the said notes not then having been fully paid, plaintiff and Krause, Sr., accounted together, and said Krause, Sr., signed a memorandum in writing wherein and whereby he acknowledged that there remained due on August 12, 1883, on the note first maturing the sum of $2,986.68, and on the other one that there remained due on said date the sum of $3,833.14, making a total due on said 12th day of August, 1883, of the sum of $6,819.82; that the said notes were just, correct, and unpaid, and for the amounts above stated, a subsisting indebtedness, and renewed the same for said aggregate amount, and promised to pay the same in gold coin, with the said rate of 12 per cent. interest, payable annually, and unpaid interest to bear the said rate of interest as if a part of the principal, and agreeing and binding himself to pay ten per cent. as attorney's fees in case the said notes should be collected by suit." The writing referred to was attached to the petition as an exhibit, and reads as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Citizens Nat. Bank of Orange, Va. v. Waugh
...v. Sumpter Drug Co., 127 Tenn. 412, 155 S. W. 167, Ann. Cas. 1914B, 1101; Simmons v. Terrell, 75 Tex. 275, 12 S. W. 854; Krause v. Pope, 78 Tex. 478, 14 S. W. 616; Kendall v. Page, 83 Tex. 131, 18 S. W. 333; Morrill v. Hoyt, 83 Tex. 59, 18 S. W. 424, 29 Am. St. Rep. 630; Laning v. Iron City......
-
Allee v. Benser
...and extension did not taint the original loan and deed of trust with usury, when the original loan was not usurious. Krause v. Pope, 78 Tex. 478, 14 S.W. 616, 619 (1890). A literal application of Maloney and Krause would require that neither the junior lienholder nor the debtor could defeat......
-
Tsesmelis v. Sinton State Bank
...the court below properly allowed the whole judgment rendered to bear interest at twelve per cent. [conventional rate]." In Krause v. Pope, 78 Tex. 478, 14 S. W. 616, judgment was rendered by the Supreme Court for the aggregate of principal, interest, and attorney's fees, and 10 per cent. pe......
-
Dunman v. Harrison
...pursuance thereof by Harrison on the 18th day of October, while the interest was made to begin on the 1st day of October. Krause v. Pope, 78 Tex. 478, 14 S. W. 616; Bank v. Wayburn, 81 Tex. 57, 16 S. W. 554. But see Knapp v. Mills, 20 Tex. 123; Rutherford v. Smith, 28 Tex. 322. On the 30th ......