140 F.3d 1140 (8th Cir. 1998), 97-2780, Hossaini v. Western Missouri Medical Center

Docket Nº:97-2780.
Citation:140 F.3d 1140
Party Name:Noorusadat HOSSAINI, Appellant, v. WESTERN MISSOURI MEDICAL CENTER, Appellee.
Case Date:April 06, 1998
Court:United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
 
FREE EXCERPT

Page 1140

140 F.3d 1140 (8th Cir. 1998)

Noorusadat HOSSAINI, Appellant,

v.

WESTERN MISSOURI MEDICAL CENTER, Appellee.

No. 97-2780.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

April 6, 1998

Submitted Jan. 12, 1998.

Page 1141

Gregory Mark Dennis, Kansas City, MO, argued (Richard W. Nobel, Kansas City, MO, on the brief), for Appellant.

Sally A. Howard, Kansas City, MO, argued (Thomas M. Sutherland, Kansas City, MO, on the brief), for Appellee.

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge, WOLLMAN and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.

Noorusadat Hossaini appeals the district court's 1 entry of summary judgment in favor of her former employer, Western Missouri Medical Center (hereinafter "WMMC" or "the hospital"), in her claim alleging unlawful termination in violation of the Employee Polygraph Protection Act (EPPA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 2001-2009. We affirm.

I.

WMMC is a county hospital located in Johnson County, Missouri, organized pursuant to Mo.Rev.Stat. §§ 205.160--205.379. 2 The hospital is managed by a board of trustees, the individual members of which are elected by the citizens of Johnson County. See Mo.Rev.Stat. § 205.170. The board of trustees has delegated the hospital's daily operational and managerial duties to WMMC's president, Greg Vinardi. Vinardi is appointed by the board of trustees and is subject to removal at their election. See Mo.Rev.Stat. § 205.190.5.

On June 19, 1992, Hossaini began working as an ultrasound technologist in WMMC's radiology department. As part of her duties at the hospital, Hossaini was expected to competently perform both general and vascular ultrasounds. During Hossaini's employment at the hospital, WMMC's management was apparently dissatisfied with her lack of proficiency in performing vascular ultrasounds. As a result, in June of 1993 Susan Black, the lead ultrasound technologist at WMMC, began compiling a list of allegedly substandard ultrasound examinations performed by Hossaini. Black did not keep a similar list for any other employee.

Shortly thereafter, WMMC discovered that each of the allegedly substandard ultrasound films identified in Black's list was missing, as was the list itself. In addition, a logbook used to document ultrasound examination information was missing. The hospital commenced an investigation of the missing items. An inventory revealed that no other films were missing. WMMC interviewed thirteen hospital employees about the missing films. Four of the employees speculated that Hossaini might have taken the missing films and logbook, while other employees offered alternative explanations. No one witnessed Hossaini take the films or logbook, and Hossaini denied ever having done so.

On October 5, 1993, WMMC sent a letter requesting that Hossaini submit to a polygraph examination pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 2006(d). This request was repeated in a letter dated October 18. Hossaini refused to take a polygraph examination and her employment

Page 1142

was terminated on November 1, 1993.

Hossaini thereafter commenced a civil rights action alleging employment discrimination based on national origin and unlawful retaliation in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (Title VII) and the Missouri Human Rights Act, Mo.Rev.Stat. §§ 213.055 and 213.070. See Hossaini v. Western Missouri Med. Ctr., 97 F.3d 1085, 1085-86 (8th Cir.1996). 3 WMMC moved for summary judgment, asserting two legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons for Hossaini's dismissal: (1) WMMC reasonably believed that Hossaini had stolen the ultrasound films and logbook; and (2) Hossaini could not adequately perform vascular ultrasounds. See id. at 1087. The district court granted summary judgment for WMMC, finding that Hossaini had failed to produce evidence showing that the hospital's proffered nondiscriminatory reasons were a pretext for discriminatory animus. See id. We reversed, concluding that Hossaini had submitted sufficient evidence to raise a factual issue with regard to pretext. See id. at 1090. Upon remand, the district court submitted the case to a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of WMMC.

Hossaini thereafter initiated the present action, alleging that she had been unlawfully discharged in violation of the EPPA. WMMC moved for summary judgment...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP