Cluett v. Claflin
Decision Date | 11 May 1891 |
Citation | 35 L.Ed. 385,140 U.S. 180,11 S.Ct. 725 |
Parties | CLUETT et al. v. CLAFLIN et al |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
This was a bill in equity to recover for the infringement of letters patent No. 156,880, granted November 17, 1874, to Robert Cluett for an improvement in shirts. In his specification the patentee stated the object of his invention to be —'First, to avoid the folding in of the edges of the bosom, and the raw edges and loose threads thereof which disfigure the bosom when so folded in; second, to stay the bosom, rendering it firmer in itself, and less likely to rumple or break; third, to avoid wrinkling of the bosom by the unevenness or fulling up of any one of the layers composing the bosom in any part thereof,— each and all of these three features having reference to the preparatory stages of manufacture, but to be completed in the bosom as attached to the shirt.'
His claims were as follows:
'(1) In combination with a shirt-body, a shirt-bosom bound on the outer edge with a folded and stitched binding, and attached to the shirt-body by a separate line of stitching through such binding.
'(2) The shirt-bosom, S, composed of two or more thicknesses of cloth, B, L, bound on the outer edge with the binding, B", and secured to the shirt-front, F, by the line of stitching, O.'
Upon the hearing in the circuit court the invention was held to be invalid for want of patentable novelty, and the bill was dismissed. 24 Blatchf. 412, and 30 Fed. Rep. 921. Plaintiffs thereupon appealed to this court.
Saml. A. Duncan and James A. Skilton, for appellants.
David Tim, for appellees.
Mr. Justice BROWN, after stating the facts as above, delivered the opinion of the court.
A large amount of testimony was taken in this case in the circuit court, but all that we find it necessary to consider lies within a very narrow compass. Stripped of its verbiage, this patent consists simply of a shirt-bosom bound at its edges, and stitched through...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Great Atlantic Pacific Tea Co v. Supermarket Equipment Corp
...of suspenders. Florsheim v. Schilling, 137 U.S. 64, 11 S.Ct. 20, 34 L.Ed. 574: Putting elastic gussets in corsets. Cluett v. Claflin, 140 U.S. 180, 11 S.Ct. 725, 35 L.Ed. 385: A shirt bosom or dickie sewn onto the front of a Adams v. Bellaire Stamping Co., 141 U.S. 539, 12 S.Ct. 66, 35 L.Ed......
-
Dederick v. Gardner
... ... It is by no ... means clear that this involved invention. McClain v ... Ortmayer, 141 U.S. 419, 12 S.Ct. 76; Cluett v ... Claflin, 140 U.S. 180, 11 S.Ct. 725; Clothing Co. v ... Glover, 141 U.S. 560, 12 S.Ct. 79; Blake v. San ... Francisco, 113 U.S. 682, 5 ... ...
-
Chase v. Catlin
... ... predicated of such a use. Clothing Co. v. Glover, ... 141 U.S. 560, 12 Sup.Ct. 79; Cluett v. Claflin, 140 ... U.S. 180, 11 Sup.Ct. 725; Peters v. Manufacturing ... Co., 129 U.S. 530, 9 Sup.Ct. 389; Holmes, etc., ... Protective Co. v ... ...
-
Dalby v. Lynes
... ... claimed invention at bar, yet in its relations to the ... domestic arts substantially the same. Another somewhat ... analogous case is Cluett v. Claflin, 140 U.S. 180, ... 11 Sup.Ct. 725, involving an alleged improvement in adjusting ... the bosom of a shirt, by which, as in complainant's ... ...