Snellings Lumber Co. v. Porter, 5 Div. 101.
Citation | 225 Ala. 164,142 So. 560 |
Decision Date | 09 June 1932 |
Docket Number | 5 Div. 101. |
Parties | SNELLINGS LUMBER CO. v. PORTER. |
Court | Supreme Court of Alabama |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Lee County; S. L. Brewer, Judge.
Bill by the Snellings Lumber Company against Wilburn Porter, to enforce a mechanic's and materialman's lien. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainant appeals.
Affirmed.
W. J Bird and J. B. Hicks, both of Phenix City, for appellant.
Duke & Duke, of Opelika, for appellee.
The demurrer to the bill as amended was sustained, and complainant was given an opportunity to amend. Failing to amend within the time extended by the decree, the cause was dismissed for want of prosecution and complainant was taxed with the costs.
From this final decree the appeal was prosecuted. De Graffenried v. Breitling, 192 Ala. 254, 68 So. 265.
The bill was filed under section 8832 et seq. of the Code, to enforce a mechanic's and materialman's lien.
The demurrer contained the ground, among others, that the verified statement claiming the lien was prematurely filed in that it was filed before, and not after, the indebtedness had accrued.
The averments of the bill as amended, in part, are as follows:
The notice exhibited is of date of January 8, 1930 and, among other averments, contains the following:
This notice was verified of date of January 8, 1930, and duly recorded in the office of the judge of probate, January 11, 1930.
The bill as amended and its exhibits constitute the pleading-one document aiding and illustrating the other. Grimsley v. First Ave. Coal & Lumber Co., 217 Ala. 159, 115 So. 90; Federal Automobile Ins. Ass'n v. Abrams, 217 Ala. 539, 117 So. 85.
The words of the statute on which the court sustained the demurrer are: "It shall be the duty of every original contractor within six months, and of every journeyman and day laborer within thirty days, and every other person entitled to such lien within four months, after the indebtedness has accrued, to file in the office of the judge of probate," etc. (Italics supplied.) Section 8836, Code.
The word "accrued" was considered in Cutcliff v. McAnally, 88 Ala. 507, 7 So. 331; yet that statute contained the further words, "a just and true account of the demand due him." Code 1876, § 3444. It will be noted these words are not contained in section 8836, Code of 1923, the words employed in the present statute being, "containing the amount of the demand secured by the lien, after all just credits have been given," etc. This wording was adverted to in College Court Realty Co. v. J. C. Letcher Lumber Co., 201 Ala. 362, 78 So. 218, and it was there held that where the material was sold on time to the owner of the building, a lien could be filed within six months of the expiration of the credit period contracted for, and by the owner.
It will be noted, however, that the statute as amended was considered in Wilbourne v. Mann, 203 Ala. 26, 81 So. 816, 818, and the observation made that no ground of demurrer was based on the fact that the "bill did not allege that within the time required by statute after the indebtedness had accrued-the maturity of the entire indebtedness thereby secured-the written statement required by law was filed," etc., citing authorities and the case of Cutcliff v. McAnally, supra; and the statement there considered was filed after the indebtedness "accrued or matured"-"the maturity of the whole claim of complainants." This definition of accrual of claim and time when statement may be filed, was acquiesced in in Morris v. Bessemer Lumber Co., 217 Ala. 441, 116 So. 528; Redd Bros. v. Todd, 209 Ala. 56, 95 So. 276; Reeder v. Cox, 218 Ala. 182, 118 So. 338; Ingram v. Howard, 221 Ala. 328, 128 So. 893; Wofford Bond & Mortgage Co. v. Adams, 222 Ala. 527, 133 So. 254; Tallapoosa Lumber Co. v. Copeland, 223 Ala. 41, 134 So. 658, 75 A. L. R. 1325; Becker Roofiing Co. v. Meharg, 223 Ala. 163, 134 So. 864.
It is clear from the averments of the amended bill that the indebtedness accrued or became due after the statement in question was filed in the probate office. This was not within the statute as construed by this court.
In discussing mechanics' liens and their enforcement, Corpus Juris says: "A lien claim, or statement filed before the time when the filing thereof is authorized by the statute, is ineffectual and unenforceable." 40 C.J. pp. 187, 189 subhead Premature Filing, §§ 218-221; 20 Am. & Eng. Enc. (2d Ed.) 390; Marchant v. Hayes, 120 Cal....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Bankers' Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Sloss, 6 Div. 511.
... ... by demurrer. Grimsley v. First Ave. Coal & Lumber ... Co., 217 Ala. 159, 115 So. 90; Webb v. Sprott, ... Griffin, 225 ... Ala. 130, 142 So. 513; Snellings Lumber Co. v ... Porter, 225 Ala. 164, 142 So. 560; ... 115, 4 ... So. 106, 5 Am. St. Rep. 342; German Alliance Insurance ... Co. v ... ...
-
U.S. v. Costas
...Lumber Co., 202 Ala. 566, 81 So. 68; Emanuel et al. v. Underwood Coal & Supply Co., 244 Ala. 436, 14 So.2d 151; Snellings Lumber Co. v. Porter, 225 Ala. 164, 142 So. 560. A materialman's or mechanic's lien created by Title 33, § 37 et seq., Code of Ala. 1940, remains inchoate and loses all ......
-
Fowler v. Mackentepe
... ... 266 233 Ala. 458 FOWLER v. MACKENTEPE. 6 Div. 38Supreme Court of AlabamaJanuary 23, 1937 ... First Ave. Coal & Lumber Co., 217 Ala. 159, 115 So. 90) ... was made and ... statute. Snellings Lumber Co. v. Porter, 225 Ala ... 164, 142 So ... ...
-
Emanuel v. Underwood Coal & Supply Co.
... ... v. UNDERWOOD COAL & SUPPLY CO. 1 Div. 182.Supreme Court of AlabamaJune 10, 1943 [14 ... materials ... [244 ... Ala. 439] 5. That complainants on, to wit, the 6th day of ... 918; Robinson v. Crotwell Bros. Lumber ... Company, 167 Ala. 566, 52 So. 733 ... 442, 88 So ... 433; Snellings Lumber Co. v. Porter, 225 Ala. 164, ... 142 So ... ...
-
CHAPTER 7 MECHANIC'S, MATERIALMEN'S, AND OTHER STATUTORY LIENS
...Id. § 35-11-218 . [13] Id. [14] Id. § 35-11-213 . [15] Id. [16] Id. [17] Id. [18] Id. § 35-11-215 ; and Snellings Lumber Co. v. Porter, 142 So. 560 (Ala. 1932). [19] Ala. Code § 35-11-215 . [20] Id. [21] Kilgore v. First Assembly of God Church, Inc., 477 So. 2d 300 (Ala. 1985); Fowler v. Ma......